Speech Part 2 Displayed Appropriate Time Outline Typed And Correct Outline Form Least Three Sources

displayed at appropriate time ______

OUTLINE

typed and in correct outline form ______

at least three sources ______

CONCLUSION

reviewed major points ______

provided memorable, creative conclusion ______

COMMENTS:

Grading Criteria for PowerPoint Activity

Name

Date

REQUIREMENTS (5)

Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1

6 to 8 slides on “What PowerPoint Can Do” 5 4 3 2 1

ORGANIZATION (5)

logically structured (clear order) 5 4 3 2 1

CONTENT (25)

touched on main functions 5 4 3 2 1

provided examples of main functions 5 4 3 2 1

content flowed together/running theme 5 4 3 2 1

slides were simple and uncomplicated 5 4 3 2 1

slides were of professional quality 5 4 3 2 1

CREATIVITY _____/5

REACTION PAPER _____/10

TOTAL _____ /50

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Grading Criteria for PowerPoint Activity

+ Excellent

√ Satisfactory

– Needs improvement

0 Failed to complete

Name

Topic

REQUIREMENTS

Speech strengths and areas for improvement

6 to 8 slides on “What PowerPoint Can Do” ______

ORGANIZATION

logically structured (clear order) ______

CONTENT

touched on main functions ______

provided examples of main functions ______

content flowed together/running theme ______

slides were simple and uncomplicated ______

slides were of professional quality ______

CREATIVITY ______

REACTION PAPER ______

COMMENTS:

Grading Sheet for Persuasive Debate

Name

Topic

Circle one: affirmative, negative

INTRODUCTION (10)

Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1

captured audience’s attention 5 4 3 2 1

established ethos/credibility 5 4 3 2 1

BODY (15)

key ideas explained 5 4 3 2 1

major points supported with citations 5 4 3 2 1

content flowed with other portions of case 5 4 3 2 1

ORGANIZATION (20)

internal summaries between major points 5 4 3 2 1

clear transitions 5 4 3 2 1

clear organizational pattern 5 4 3 2 1

credible and appropriate sources 5 4 3 2 1

OUTLINE (25)

typed and in correct outline form

at least five sources

5

4

3

2

1

written in correct APA style

internal summaries included and labeled

5

4

3

2

1

Grading Sheet for Persuasive Debate

+ Excellent

√ Satisfactory

– Needs improvement

0 Failed to complete

Name

Topic

Circle one: affirmative, negative

INTRODUCTION

Speech strengths and areas for improvement

captured audience’s attention ______

established ethos/credibility ______

content flowed with other portions of case ______

ORGANIZATION

internal summaries between major points ______

clear transitions ______

clear organizational pattern ______

credible and appropriate sources ______

LANGUAGE

concise, colorful ______

creative, culturally sensitive ______

DELIVERY

vocally expressive, conversational style ______

adequate eye contact ______

avoided nervous mannerisms ______

generally effective and extemporaneous ______

OUTLINE

typed and in correct outline form ______

at least five sources ______

written in correct APA style ______

internal summaries included and labeled ______

transitions included and labeled ______

Name

Topic

INTRODUCTION (15)

Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1

captured audience’s attention

5 4 3 2 1

LANGUAGE (10)

concise, colorful 5 4 3 2 1

creative, culturally sensitive 5 4 3 2 1

DELIVERY (20)

vocally expressive, conversational style 5 4 3 2 1

adequate eye contact 5 4 3 2 1

avoided nervous mannerisms 5 4 3 2 1

cohesion among team members 5 4 3 2 1

POWERPOINT VISUAL AIDS (20)

speaker’s ability to use the technology 5 4 3 2 1

creativity/full use of resources 5 4 3 2 1

simple and uncomplicated 5 4 3 2 1

professional quality/fit project’s theme 5 4 3 2 1

OUTLINE (25)

typed and in correct outline form 5 4 3 2 1

at least five sources 5 4 3 2 1

written in correct APA style 5 4 3 2 1

internal summaries included and labeled 5 4 3 2 1

transitions included and labeled 5 4 3 2 1

GROUP EVALUATION _____/ 10

TOTAL_____/125

Grading Sheet for Professional Presentation

+ Excellent

√ Satisfactory

– Needs improvement

0 Failed to complete

Name

Topic

INTRODUCTION

Speech strengths and areas for improvement

captured audience’s attention ______

established ethos/credibility ______

purpose/introduced group members ______

BODY

key ideas explained ______

points supported (citations/arguments) ______

feasible/realistic proposal ______

ORGANIZATION

clear organizational pattern ______

credible source material included ______

realistic idea and implementation ______

LANGUAGE

concise, colorful ______

creative, culturally sensitive ______

DELIVERY

vocally expressive, conversational style ______

adequate eye contact ______

avoided nervous mannerisms ______

cohesion among team members ______

POWERPOINT VISUAL AIDS

speaker’s ability to use the technology ______

creativity/full use of resources ______

simple and uncomplicated ______

professional quality/fit project’s theme ______

OUTLINE

typed and in correct outline form ______

at least five sources ______

written in correct APA style ______

internal summaries included and labeled ______

transitions included and labeled ______

GROUP EVALUATION _______

COMMENTS:

Description and Grading Sheet for Team Workshop (Optional)

1. Instructor divides students into three teams of ten (or fewer).

2. Students need to develop instruments and procedures for providing performance

feedback to team members to enhance individual growth and group effectiveness.

3. Each team must design and manage a class workshop on specific concepts related to

one of the following three major topic areas:

 Team workshop 1: Basic Public Speaking Skills and Obstacles

 Team workshop 2: Informing Diverse Audiences

 Team workshop 3: Persuading Diverse Audiences

4. Each workshop should include (a) a one-page synopsis of the major conceptual issues;

(b) a demonstration of key concepts, and (c) activities that involve members of the class.

Grading Sheet for Team Workshop No. _____

EVALUATION CATEGORY Points/

1. Quality of handouts (e.g., summary of major conceptual issues) _____/

2. Demonstration of key concepts _____/

3. How well the workshop involved members of the class _____/

COMMENTS:

Strong points

Weak points

Self-Evaluation Video Sheet

Name

Date

Title/Topic

How well have you met each section of the grading sheet requirements?

How well did you explain and support your ideas (e.g., evidence, testimony, examples)

How effectively did you use previews?

How effectively did you use internal summaries?

How effectively did you use transitions?

Did you provide adequate nonverbal support (e.g., gestures, eye contact)?

What was your greatest strength?

What was your greatest weakness?

How will you overcome it?

Peer Evaluation Sheet

Name

Date

Title/Topic

How did the speaker meet each section of the grading sheet requirements?

How well did the speaker explain and support his or her ideas (e.g., evidence, testimony,

examples)?

How effectively did the speaker use previews?

How effectively did the speaker use internal summaries?

How effectively did the speaker use transitions?

Discuss the speaker’s nonverbal support (e.g., gestures, eye contact).

What was the speaker’s greatest strength?

What was the speaker’s greatest weakness? How might he or she overcome it?

Outside Speech Critique Evaluation 1

Your name

Speaker’s name

Date and time

1. How did the speaker gain the attention of the audience?

2. How did the speaker relate the topic to the audience?

3. What was the thesis statement of the speech (or the main purpose)?

4. Was there a preview of the main points? List them.

5. How well did the speaker use supporting material? Give examples.

6. Discuss the speaker’s conclusion. How well did he or she summarize the main

theme? Did the speaker review the major points? To what extent was the conclusion

creative?

7. Discuss the speaker’s use of language. Was it clear, concise, creative?

8. Discuss the speaker’s delivery (e.g., eye contact, gestures, vocal variety).

9. In what parts of the speech could the speaker have improved this presentation?

Outside Speech Critique Evaluation 2

Your name

Speaker’s name

Date and time

1. How did the speaker gain the attention of the audience?

2. How did the speaker relate the topic to the audience?

3. What was the thesis statement of the speech (or the main purpose)?

4. Was there a preview of the main points? List them.

5. How well did the speaker use supporting material? Give examples.

6. Discuss the speaker’s conclusion. How well did he or she summarize the main theme?

Did the speaker review the major points? To what extent was the conclusion creative?

7. Discuss the speaker’s use of language. Was it clear, concise, creative?

8. Discuss the speaker’s delivery (e.g., eye contact, gestures, vocal variety).

9. In what parts of the speech could the speaker have improved this presentation?

Public Speaking Midterm Course Evaluation

Course Evaluation

What do you feel are the strengths of the class? (consider the textbook, supplemental

resources, use of technology, teaching style, assignments, group work, arrangement of

class time, expectations, course policies, etc.)

What sorts of technology do you like to see used in class?

What suggestions do you have to improve the course?

Instructor Evaluation