Unlock document.
This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
displayed at appropriate time ______
OUTLINE
typed and in correct outline form ______
at least three sources ______
CONCLUSION
reviewed major points ______
provided memorable, creative conclusion ______
COMMENTS:
Grading Criteria for PowerPoint Activity
Name
Date
REQUIREMENTS (5)
Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1
6 to 8 slides on “What PowerPoint Can Do” 5 4 3 2 1
ORGANIZATION (5)
logically structured (clear order) 5 4 3 2 1
CONTENT (25)
touched on main functions 5 4 3 2 1
provided examples of main functions 5 4 3 2 1
content flowed together/running theme 5 4 3 2 1
slides were simple and uncomplicated 5 4 3 2 1
slides were of professional quality 5 4 3 2 1
CREATIVITY _____/5
REACTION PAPER _____/10
TOTAL _____ /50
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Grading Criteria for PowerPoint Activity
+ Excellent
√ Satisfactory
– Needs improvement
0 Failed to complete
Name
Topic
REQUIREMENTS
Speech strengths and areas for improvement
6 to 8 slides on “What PowerPoint Can Do” ______
ORGANIZATION
logically structured (clear order) ______
CONTENT
touched on main functions ______
provided examples of main functions ______
content flowed together/running theme ______
slides were simple and uncomplicated ______
slides were of professional quality ______
CREATIVITY ______
REACTION PAPER ______
COMMENTS:
Grading Sheet for Persuasive Debate
Name
Topic
Circle one: affirmative, negative
INTRODUCTION (10)
Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1
captured audience’s attention 5 4 3 2 1
established ethos/credibility 5 4 3 2 1
BODY (15)
key ideas explained 5 4 3 2 1
major points supported with citations 5 4 3 2 1
content flowed with other portions of case 5 4 3 2 1
ORGANIZATION (20)
internal summaries between major points 5 4 3 2 1
clear transitions 5 4 3 2 1
clear organizational pattern 5 4 3 2 1
credible and appropriate sources 5 4 3 2 1
OUTLINE (25)
typed and in correct outline form
at least five sources
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
written in correct APA style
internal summaries included and labeled
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
Grading Sheet for Persuasive Debate
+ Excellent
√ Satisfactory
– Needs improvement
0 Failed to complete
Name
Topic
Circle one: affirmative, negative
INTRODUCTION
Speech strengths and areas for improvement
captured audience’s attention ______
established ethos/credibility ______
content flowed with other portions of case ______
ORGANIZATION
internal summaries between major points ______
clear transitions ______
clear organizational pattern ______
credible and appropriate sources ______
LANGUAGE
concise, colorful ______
creative, culturally sensitive ______
DELIVERY
vocally expressive, conversational style ______
adequate eye contact ______
avoided nervous mannerisms ______
generally effective and extemporaneous ______
OUTLINE
typed and in correct outline form ______
at least five sources ______
written in correct APA style ______
internal summaries included and labeled ______
transitions included and labeled ______
Name
Topic
INTRODUCTION (15)
Scale Agree=5 Disagree=1
captured audience’s attention
5 4 3 2 1
LANGUAGE (10)
concise, colorful 5 4 3 2 1
creative, culturally sensitive 5 4 3 2 1
DELIVERY (20)
vocally expressive, conversational style 5 4 3 2 1
adequate eye contact 5 4 3 2 1
avoided nervous mannerisms 5 4 3 2 1
cohesion among team members 5 4 3 2 1
POWERPOINT VISUAL AIDS (20)
speaker’s ability to use the technology 5 4 3 2 1
creativity/full use of resources 5 4 3 2 1
simple and uncomplicated 5 4 3 2 1
professional quality/fit project’s theme 5 4 3 2 1
OUTLINE (25)
typed and in correct outline form 5 4 3 2 1
at least five sources 5 4 3 2 1
written in correct APA style 5 4 3 2 1
internal summaries included and labeled 5 4 3 2 1
transitions included and labeled 5 4 3 2 1
GROUP EVALUATION _____/ 10
TOTAL_____/125
Grading Sheet for Professional Presentation
+ Excellent
√ Satisfactory
– Needs improvement
0 Failed to complete
Name
Topic
INTRODUCTION
Speech strengths and areas for improvement
captured audience’s attention ______
established ethos/credibility ______
purpose/introduced group members ______
BODY
key ideas explained ______
points supported (citations/arguments) ______
feasible/realistic proposal ______
ORGANIZATION
clear organizational pattern ______
credible source material included ______
realistic idea and implementation ______
LANGUAGE
concise, colorful ______
creative, culturally sensitive ______
DELIVERY
vocally expressive, conversational style ______
adequate eye contact ______
avoided nervous mannerisms ______
cohesion among team members ______
POWERPOINT VISUAL AIDS
speaker’s ability to use the technology ______
creativity/full use of resources ______
simple and uncomplicated ______
professional quality/fit project’s theme ______
OUTLINE
typed and in correct outline form ______
at least five sources ______
written in correct APA style ______
internal summaries included and labeled ______
transitions included and labeled ______
GROUP EVALUATION _______
COMMENTS:
Description and Grading Sheet for Team Workshop (Optional)
1. Instructor divides students into three teams of ten (or fewer).
2. Students need to develop instruments and procedures for providing performance
feedback to team members to enhance individual growth and group effectiveness.
3. Each team must design and manage a class workshop on specific concepts related to
one of the following three major topic areas:
Team workshop 1: Basic Public Speaking Skills and Obstacles
Team workshop 2: Informing Diverse Audiences
Team workshop 3: Persuading Diverse Audiences
4. Each workshop should include (a) a one-page synopsis of the major conceptual issues;
(b) a demonstration of key concepts, and (c) activities that involve members of the class.
Grading Sheet for Team Workshop No. _____
EVALUATION CATEGORY Points/
1. Quality of handouts (e.g., summary of major conceptual issues) _____/
2. Demonstration of key concepts _____/
3. How well the workshop involved members of the class _____/
COMMENTS:
Strong points
Weak points
Self-Evaluation Video Sheet
Name
Date
Title/Topic
How well have you met each section of the grading sheet requirements?
How well did you explain and support your ideas (e.g., evidence, testimony, examples)
How effectively did you use previews?
How effectively did you use internal summaries?
How effectively did you use transitions?
Did you provide adequate nonverbal support (e.g., gestures, eye contact)?
What was your greatest strength?
What was your greatest weakness?
How will you overcome it?
Peer Evaluation Sheet
Name
Date
Title/Topic
How did the speaker meet each section of the grading sheet requirements?
How well did the speaker explain and support his or her ideas (e.g., evidence, testimony,
examples)?
How effectively did the speaker use previews?
How effectively did the speaker use internal summaries?
How effectively did the speaker use transitions?
Discuss the speaker’s nonverbal support (e.g., gestures, eye contact).
What was the speaker’s greatest strength?
What was the speaker’s greatest weakness? How might he or she overcome it?
Outside Speech Critique Evaluation 1
Your name
Speaker’s name
Date and time
1. How did the speaker gain the attention of the audience?
2. How did the speaker relate the topic to the audience?
3. What was the thesis statement of the speech (or the main purpose)?
4. Was there a preview of the main points? List them.
5. How well did the speaker use supporting material? Give examples.
6. Discuss the speaker’s conclusion. How well did he or she summarize the main
theme? Did the speaker review the major points? To what extent was the conclusion
creative?
7. Discuss the speaker’s use of language. Was it clear, concise, creative?
8. Discuss the speaker’s delivery (e.g., eye contact, gestures, vocal variety).
9. In what parts of the speech could the speaker have improved this presentation?
Outside Speech Critique Evaluation 2
Your name
Speaker’s name
Date and time
1. How did the speaker gain the attention of the audience?
2. How did the speaker relate the topic to the audience?
3. What was the thesis statement of the speech (or the main purpose)?
4. Was there a preview of the main points? List them.
5. How well did the speaker use supporting material? Give examples.
6. Discuss the speaker’s conclusion. How well did he or she summarize the main theme?
Did the speaker review the major points? To what extent was the conclusion creative?
7. Discuss the speaker’s use of language. Was it clear, concise, creative?
8. Discuss the speaker’s delivery (e.g., eye contact, gestures, vocal variety).
9. In what parts of the speech could the speaker have improved this presentation?
Public Speaking Midterm Course Evaluation
Course Evaluation
What do you feel are the strengths of the class? (consider the textbook, supplemental
resources, use of technology, teaching style, assignments, group work, arrangement of
class time, expectations, course policies, etc.)
What sorts of technology do you like to see used in class?
What suggestions do you have to improve the course?
Instructor Evaluation
