Chapter 9 DNA-Based Information Technologies S-109
15. Finding Disease Genes You are a gene hunter, trying to find the genetic basis for a case inherited
disease. Examination of six pedigrees of families affected by the disease provides inconsistent results.
For two of the families, the disease is co-inherited with markers on chromosome 7. For the other four
families, the disease is co-inherited with markers on chromosome 12. Explain how this might occur.
Data Analysis Problem
16. HincII: The First Restriction Endonuclease Discovery of the first restriction endonuclease to be of
practical use was reported in two papers published in 1970. In the first paper, Smith and Wilcox de-
scribed the isolation of an enzyme that cleaved double-stranded DNA. They initially demonstrated the
enzyme’s nuclease activity by measuring the decrease in viscosity of DNA samples treated with the
enzyme.
(a) Why does treatment with a nuclease decrease the viscosity of a solution of DNA?
The authors determined whether the enzyme was an endo- or an exonuclease by treating
32
P-labeled
DNA with the enzyme, then adding trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Under the conditions used in their experi-
ment, single nucleotides would be TCA-soluble and oligonucleotides would precipitate.
(b) No TCA-soluble
32
P-labeled material formed on treatment of
32
P-labeled DNA with the nuclease.
Based on this finding, is the enzyme an endo- or exonuclease? Explain your reasoning.
When a polynucleotide is cleaved, the phosphate usually is not removed but remains attached to
the 5⬘or 3⬘end of the resulting DNA fragment. Smith and Wilcox determined the location of the phos-
phate on the fragment formed by the nuclease in the following steps:
1. Treat unlabeled DNA with the nuclease.
2. Treat a sample (A) of the product with ␥–
32
P-labeled ATP and polynucleotide kinase (which
can attach the ␥-phosphate of ATP to a 5⬘OH but not to a 5⬘phosphate or to a 3⬘OH or 3⬘
phosphate). Measure the amount of
32
P incorporated into the DNA.
3. Treat another sample (B) of the product of step 1 with alkaline phosphatase (which removes
phosphate groups from free 5⬘and 3⬘ends), followed by polynucleotide kinase and
␥–
32
P-labeled ATP. Measure the amount of
32
P incorporated into the DNA.
(c) Smith and Wilcox found that sample A had 136 counts/min of
32
P; sample B had 3,740
counts/min. Did the nuclease cleavage leave the phosphate on the 5⬘or the 3⬘end of the DNA
fragments? Explain your reasoning.
(d) Treatment of bacteriophage T7 DNA with the nuclease gave approximately 40 specific fragments
of various lengths. How is this result consistent with the enzyme’s recognizing a specific
sequence in the DNA as opposed to making random double-strand breaks?
At this point, there were two possibilities for the site-specific cleavage: the cleavage occurred either
(1) at the site of recognition or (2) near the site of recognition but not within the sequence recognized.
To address this issue, Kelly and Smith determined the sequence of the 5⬘ends of the DNA fragments
generated by the nuclease, in the following steps:
1. Treat phage T7 DNA with the enzyme.
2. Treat the resulting fragments with alkaline phosphatase to remove the 5⬘phosphates.
3. Treat the dephosphorylated fragments with polynucleotide kinase and ␥–
32
P-labeled ATP to
label the 5⬘ends.