JUDGMENT CALL 8: SHOULD SAME SEX EDUCATION BE
ALLOWED IN SCHOOLS THAT RECEIVE FEDERAL SUPPORT?
Title IX states that schools that receive federal funds cannot discriminate on the basis
of sex. Thus, schools that accept federal support must not show preference to either sex in
admission, and they must provide “equal opportunities” in school-sponsored courses, co-
curricular, and athletic activities.
Title IX was recently tested when women applied to the Citadel, a military training
school in South Carolina that had admitted only males since it opened its doors. The Citadel
went through several levels of court battles in its fight to remain an exclusively male school, but
the Citadel lost the fight. The courts ruled that as long as the Citadel accepted federal funds, it
must admit qualified women who want to enroll in one of the top military training institutions.
To do otherwise would be to refuse to provide women with the same opportunities to prepare
for military careers that men have historically had.
Even though Title IX prohibits discrimination by schools receiving federal support,
some educators believe that sex-segregated education is desirable—at least in some cases. For
example, research has shown that many female students learn more in sex-segregated math and
science classes. Studies also show that a greater percentage of women who attend traditional
women’s colleges become leaders in business and government than women who attend co–
educational schools.
Yet the law is very clear. Any school that accepts federal funds must provide equal
opportunities to students of both sexes and all races. Supporters of these laws argue that sex–
segregated education exists now and can continue to exist in private schools, but not in
schools that receive federal funding.
Is it acceptable to have sex-segregated education (classes or whole schools) when
federal support is provided? As you reflect on the question, consider these prompts and consult
the websites listed below:
Can separate education be “equal”? Is it possible that women and men are more
likely to receive an equal quality education if they are in separate classes or schools?
To learn more about research (pros and cons) on sex-segregated education and
about alternative ways of achieving gender equity in education visit this site:
http://www.now.org/issues/education/single-sex-education-comments.html
Should federal funding be a criterion for making decisions about how
educational institutions operate?
Does historic discrimination (both legal and attitudinal) against women
justify providing special educational opportunities to girls and women today?
Is it fair to argue that there should be women only classes in science and math
because those classes benefit women, and, at the same time, to argue that
historically male institutions such as the Citadel should not be allowed to exclude
women?
If women are admitted to formerly all-male schools, should the schools adjust their
policies and practices? The Citadel, for example, prides itself on harsh discipline,
lack of privacy, and punitive treatment of students.
To gain understanding of military institutions and how their history might affect your judgment
on the issue of admitting women, visit these websites: