5.
First, come up with a best-case scenario of yourself as a worker and/or parent ten years from
now. What would an average, good workday look like? Next, consider whether some of the
formal and informal gendered organizational patterns discussed in Chapter 10 would help
you enact or hinder you from enacting an average, good day. If gendered organizational
patterns stand in the way, how would you suggest changing those patterns to allow you (and
others) to achieve their dreams and goals?
Suggested Activities
1.
Panel: Balancing Work and Home: Invite a panel of dual-worker couples to discuss ways
they balance roles, duties, and obligations within the home and professional organization. In
our classes, students have responded favorably to this panel as they move out of the
educational system and into organizational contexts. Couples negotiating these challenges
often open the eyes of students to the “pitfalls” and pleasures of dual-worker relationships.
In discussing your expectations with the couples you invited to participate, encourage them
to reflect on and discuss such issues as “second shift” duties in the home and caregiving
responsibilities for children and parents, when applicable. Student response tends to be
highly positive to this panel, as it illustrates challenges they have not considered in
conducting and maintaining relationships.
2.
Stereotypes in the Workplace: Split your class into small groups (minimum of three
people). Assign each group a stereotype. Provide ten minutes for them to brainstorm how to
perform the act(s) of stereotyping. Ask them to perform (within five minutes) for the larger
class. This exercise helps students identify the type of comments and behaviors that are
communicated to reinforce limiting gender stereotypes. The instructor that introduced us to
this popular exercise recommends you caution your students that no one should perform the
stereotype (because they are most often inaccurate). This exercise is directed at how people
stereotype individuals who are, in return, limited by these reductionary roles.
3.
Nickel and Dimed: Assigning chapters from Barbara Ehrenreich’s Nickel and Dimed
provides an excellent springboard for rich discussions concerning labor, hierarchy, and
mobility that often lead naturally into debates surrounding legislation to redress inequities.
Some possibilities for opening discussion: To what extent are people able to freely choose
their labor? What are the precursors to choosing one’s labor, and to social mobility? (i.e.
education, proper food and shelter, health care, etc.) How might we better enable choice
and mobility for America’s working and poverty classes? Given the ways in which sexism,
racism, and classism have historically informed social hierarchies, what methods of redress
do you think are useful and/or productive?
4.
Panel: Nontraditionally Gendered Workers: Invite a panel of speakers who work in jobs
that are not or have not historically been seen in our culture as typical for their sex. This
may include female lawyers, construction workers, police officers and male nurses,
elementary school teachers, and administrative assistants. Ask the panelists to speak about
how they navigate another-sex-dominated field given their sex, including any difficulties
and positive aspects. Ask your students to generate questions for the panelists. You may