2
Lecture #1
Discussion:
Begin Lecture #1 by discussing “Timeless Links: The Art that Shocks.” Explore the examples
given of “shocking” art and what categorizes them as such. Continue the discussion by looking at
the works of artists Vasily Kandinsky, Piet Mondrian, and others. Using images from the text,
examine the visual components of their work and speak to their influences. How did their work
differ from early twentieth-century painting? Also discuss architecture. Speak to the International
Style and its intentions.
Class Questions/Prompts:
Quotes by Kandinsky Vasily Kandinsky wanted to create a spiritual effect in his art by focusing
on the correlation to music and the formal elements of the composition. He said “Color is the
keyboard, the eyes are the hammers, the soul is the piano with many strings. The artist is the
hand that plays, touching one key or another purposively, to cause vibrations in the soul.”
Explore this relationship of music and art in Kandinsky’s work. Kandinsky was also interested in
the physiological and sensory qualities of color, such as how “absolute green is the most restful
color, lacking any undertone of joy, grief, or passion. On exhausted men, this restfulness has a
beneficial effect, but after a time it becomes tedious.” Consider how color makes you feel, how
colors have a scent, a taste, and a sound. Refer to Kandinsky’s book Concerning the Spiritual in
Art for more on the effects of color.
Le Corbusier Le Corbusier initially designed architecture in the International Style, as seen in
Villa Savoye (figure 19-9). Compare Notre Dame du Haut (figures 19-28 and 19-29) with Villa
Savoye and Philip Johnson’s Glass House (figure 19-27) that was built around the same time.
How did his style change? Why did Le Corbusier change the direction of his designs?
A Better World Architecture Early twentieth–century architects like Le Corbusier and Walter
Gropius thought they could make the world a better place through good architecture. How is that
possible? Is that an achievable goal? Why or why not?
Shocking Explore with students the concept of “shocking art.” Why is it that art in one period
can be considered perfectly acceptable, but at another point in time, it is considered obscene or
“shocking.” Do you think artists of yesterday would be “shocked” by such art as the performance
pieces that are popular today? Would they consider those works of art? Do you?