COMM5 Instructor Manual Chapter 16
16–16
the average American speaks. And he always made it very clear when he was veering from
the reporting the news to expressing an opinion. A tireless advocate of objective journalism,
he once said, “[The journalist’s] job is only to hold up the mirror—to tell and show the
public what has happened.”
Contrast this image of responsible, reliable reportage with the information we receive
from many cable TV news programs today. In an effort to fulfill cable TV’s demand for 24–
hour-a-day programming, even respected news organizations such as CNN must present
not only the “hard news” but also news analysis, sensational graphics, and chitchat among
program hosts. As a result, the news many people watch blurs the lines between opinion,
entertainment, and the straightforward presentation of facts. In addition, some cable news
anchors and show hosts have become the subject of controversy for their on-air rants,
partisan attacks, and melodramatic grandstanding, including Bill O’Reilly, Keith Olbermann,
and Geraldo Rivera—all of whom are reporters who were trained in the principles of fair
reporting.
Another factor that makes us suspect the information in news reports is biased is how
events are covered. News coverage during presidential campaigns tends to generate a lot of
interest and analysis. During the 2008 presidential race, some charged the media was
showing bias in support of Democratic candidate Barack Obama. The Washington Post’s
Deborah Howell reported that during the first week of June 2008, Obama dominated political
stories by 142 to Republican candidate John McCain’s 96, a 3–to-1 advantage. Although she
acknowledged that numbers weren’t everything and that Obama generated a lot of coverage
because he was the first African American nominee and initially less well-known than
McCain, she argued that readers deserved comparable coverage of both candidates.
Nonetheless, there is little consensus in the debate over media bias. People disagree not
only about the issue of bias itself, but also about how to determine if there is bias, or if such
a determination is even possible. For example, expert statistical analysis of media bias, such
as A Measure of Media Bias by Tim Groseclose and Jeffrey Milyo, has been disputed by other
experts who believed there were faults in this study’s research methods. And Scientific
American’s Vivian B. Martin writes, “Most media scholars do not think the issue of bias can
be settled by a formula.”
Whatever your thoughts about media bias, you’ll be a better-informed consumer if learn
how to evaluate news source bias critically. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)
provides a helpful list of factors that can contribute to bias in news reporting:
• Corporate ownership
• Advertiser influence
• Official agendas
• Telecommunications policy
• The public relations industry
• Pressure groups
• The narrow range of debate
• Censorship
• Sensationalism
FAIR also recommends asking the following critical questions when evaluating news
information:
• Who are the sources?
• Is there a lack of diversity?
• From whose point of view is the news reported?
• Are there double standards?
• What are the unchallenged assumptions?
• Is the language loaded?
• Is there a lack of context?