Instructor’s Notes on Text Cases
be made that in a country where bribery is part of the way of doing business, there is an identifiable
system of how much bribes are made, how much for different activities, when paid and to whom paid.
One retired British executive once graded bribes as: 5% of $200,000 will be interesting to a senior official
below the top rank, while 5% of $200 million justifies the serious attention of the head of state.3 Anyone
being sent to a country where bribery is an important aspect of doing business should be well versed on
the system of bribery in the country and be prepared to deal with it effectively.
Pertinent Facts
The Latin American sales effort of Starnes-Brenner Machine Tool Company of Iowa City, Iowa centers
around a one-man operation in Latino. The company is changing its international marketing emphasis and
is going to act more aggressively as an international firm. A new salesman is going to replace the Latino
representative who is retiring. During the training period the new man who is a company man from the
U.S., is introduced to the role bribery plays in doing business in Latin America. He questions the ethics of
the practice and the rationality of it as a means of doing business profitably. The retiring representative
points out that the firm in Latino, in addition to making a profit, is stimulating the economy of the country
and that since bribery is a recognized means of doing business it is stimulating to the economy of Latino.
He proposes that ethics will rise with an increase in the standard of living.
Bribery persists as a problem the world over. In China, many of the Republics of the former USSR, and
elsewhere, the business person is confronted with the decision to bribe or not to bribe. The instructor may
want to have the students review the section on Business Ethics in Chapter 5 before attempting this case.
It may be useful to have them examine the case without using the decision tree for ethical and socially
responsible decisions (Exhibit 5-4) and then to review the case using the decision tree. The advantage of
using the decision tree is to help them focus their thinking on the consequences of their decisions.
One of the purposes of this case is to explore all the ramifications of bribery. A point raised in the case
concerned bribery in the U.S. The attitude presented is that all others engage in wholesale bribery but that
Americans are somehow above it all, except for isolated cases.
Discussion Topic
An interesting comment from a retired agent in the U.S. Foreign Service raises questions about how
strictly the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is enforced. Although the U.S. Foreign Service agent was
referring to his experience in China, it might be interesting to discuss his comments with the Latino case.
An economics officer of the U.S. Foreign Service said he intentionally subverted the intent of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act so U.S. investors and exporters would not lose out unfairly to companies
and agencies from other foreign countries.
“I figured out how business was actually done in corrupt countries who was on the take, whether
the going rate for host country cooperation in particular types of transactions was 10 percent or 25 percent
and who was good or bad as a go between.”
I would tell Americans trying to do business in the host country: “Don’t tell me about any corrupt
practices you are engaged in, because I am obliged to write that up and report you to Washington but do
tell me in detail about corrupt activities by competing foreign companies. In return, if your information is
interesting, I’ll give you my best guess on how corruption works here,” By doing this I hope that I have
helped level the playing field.—(Walter H. Drew, “Corrupt Thinking,” Foreign Policy May/June 2005.)
3 Robert Keatley, “U. S. Campaign Against Bribery Faces Resistance from Foreign Governments,” The Wall Street Journal, February 4, 1994, p.
A-10.