Key West Fisheries
Teaching Note
A decision tree describing Harry Morgan’s basic problem is shown below. If
Morgan rejects the contract, his monetary position at the end of the year
depends on the price of tuna and the size of his catch. The expected value of
this option is $49,500 after averaging over the four equally likely outcomes.
If Morgan accepts the contract, he locks in a fixed price for 150,000 pounds
of his catch, but the profit from his domestic sales is still uncertain. Thus, he
faces the same chance branches as in the reject decision. After learning about
the type of season(s) and the going price of tuna, he decides how to ship the
fish. Thus, there is a decision square at the end of each of the four chance
branches. He is free to make different shipping decisions in different types of
seasons.1 (This decision is simple since it is made after all uncertainty has
been resolved.)
The decision tree shows that his most profitable shipping decision depends
on the price of tuna. If the going price is $.80 or $1.00 (when the Pacific
catch is small), hiring the freighter is the more profitable option. If the going
price is $.50 or $.70 (when the Pacific catch is large), using his own boat
more profitable. There is an easy intuitive explanation for this result. When
domestic prices are high, the opportunity cost of using his own boat exceeds
the explicit cost of hiring the freighter. Accordingly the freighter is the better
option. Conversely, when domestic prices are low, doing it yourself costs
little and is the better option.
Comparing the expected values of the alternatives, we see that a risk-neutral
decision maker should reject the contract.
11 We have not shown one possible shipping option: transporting half the
catch by freighter and half by one’s own boat. The value of this option
always lies midway between the values of shipping all by freighter and all
by own boat. Thus, it is always worse than one of the “all or none”
alternatives and can be eliminated from consideration.
John Wiley & Sons
12-=