THE CHAPTER IN A NUTSHELL
Economic growth is an important determinant of a nation’s average standard of living. If output
grows faster than the population, the average living standard will rise, but if output grows more
slowly than the population, the average living standard will fall.
We can see how important even small differences in growth rates are by the application of the
rule of 70. Even a 1% increase in the real GDP growth rate can cause a huge increase in living
standards over time.
At first glance, it looks as if poor countries will remain poor regardless of circumstance.
However, once the real GDP per capita graphs are adjusted for the significant differences among
rich and poor countries, the outlook isn’t nearly as bleak. Examples include China, India and
Uganda.
A useful way to start thinking about long-run growth is to look at what determines our potential
GDP in any given period. Real GDP depends on the amount of output the average worker can
produce in an hour, the number of hours the average worker spends at the job, the fraction of the
population that wants to work, and the size of the population.
Ultimately, growth in real GDP—by itself—does not guarantee a rising standard of living. What
matters for the standard of living is real GDP per capita—our total output of goods and services
per person. To explain growth in output per person and living standards in the U.S. and other
developed nations, economists look at two factors: increases in labor force participation rates and
growth in productivity. Over the long run, the labor force participation rate rises when
employment grows at a faster rate than the population.
Growth in employment occurs when the demand for labor or the supply of labor increases.
Government policies can help to increase employment. Income tax rate reductions and reductions
in government transfer payments are policies that increase the supply of labor. Policies that help
increase the skills of the work force (such as education and training subsidies) and policies that
subsidize employment directly (such as wage subsidies) increase the demand for labor.
Population growth, growth in average hours, and increases in the labor force participation rate
cannot explain growth in total output—and living standards—over the long run. Over the past
several decades, and into the near future, virtually all growth in the average standard of living
can be attributed to growth in productivity. One key to productivity growth is the nation’s capital
stock. If the capital stock grows faster than employment, then capital per worker will rise, and
labor productivity will increase. But if the capital stock grows more slowly than employment,
then capital per worker will fall, and labor productivity will fall as well.
A government seeking to spur investment—and thereby increase the growth rate of the capital
stock—can direct its efforts toward businesses, toward the household sector, or toward its own
budget. Reducing business taxes or providing specific investment incentives can shift the
investment curve rightward. Policies that alter the tax and transfer system can increase incentives
for saving. This makes more funds available for investment, speeding growth in the capital stock.
Finally, a shrinking deficit tends to reduce interest rates and increase investment, although
shrinking the deficit by cutting government investment will not stimulate growth as much as