Decisions by banks and other large financial institutions to move billions of dollars from one
country to another are responsible for exchange rate changes in the very short run. These
decisions to move “hot money” are made in split seconds in response to changes in relative
interest rates and expectations of future exchange rates.
Economic fluctuations are the main cause of short-run exchange rate changes. Generally, a
country whose GDP rises relatively rapidly will experience a depreciation of its currency, and
vice versa.
In the long run, according to the purchasing power parity (PPP) theory, an exchange rate will
adjust until the average price of goods is roughly the same in both countries. The existence of
non-tradable goods, high transportation costs, and artificial trade barriers all limit such perfect
price adjustment. An important implication of PPP theory is that the currency of a country with a
higher inflation rate will depreciate against the currency of a country whose inflation rate is
lower.
Governments sometimes intervene in foreign exchange markets involving their currency. They
may choose to intervene in foreign exchange markets when high exchange rates are harming
export-oriented industries, when falling exchange rates are leading to a general rise in domestic
prices, and when volatile exchange rates are making trading arrangements risky. Under a
managed float, a country’s central bank buys its own currency to prevent a depreciation, and sells
its own currency to prevent an appreciation. A more extreme form of intervention is a fixed
exchange rate, in which a government declares a particular value for its exchange rate with
another country and then, through its central bank, commits itself to intervene anytime the
equilibrium exchange rate differs from the fixed rate.
A foreign currency crisis is a loss of faith that a country can prevent a drop in its exchange rate,
and leads to a rapid depletion of its foreign currency. Thailand’s financial crisis of 1997-1998 is
explained using the concept of a foreign currency crisis. The International Monetary Fund (IMF)
resolved this crisis—an organization formed in large part to help nations avoid such foreign
currency crises and help them recover when crises occur. Such a rescue is controversial,
however, since it creates a moral hazard problem. Moral hazard occurs when a decision maker
expects to be rescued in the event of an unfavorable outcome, and then changes their behavior so
that the unfavorable outcome is more likely. The problem of moral hazard helps explain the
IMF’s response to Argentina’s foreign currency crisis of 2001-2002.
Exchange rates can have important effects on the macroeconomy—largely through their effect on
net exports. A dollar depreciation causes net exports to rise and leads to an increase in real GDP
in the short run. A dollar appreciation does just the opposite. When we include the impact on
exchange rates and net exports, we find that monetary policy has a stronger effect on the
economy than initially described.
A country’s trade deficit measures the extent to which its imports exceed its exports. When
exports exceed imports, a nation has a trade surplus.
The United States has a trade deficit with the rest of the world since the early 1980s because of a
massive capital inflow that arose in the early 1980s and has grown larger since. A rise in U.S.
interest rates relative to interest rates abroad, coupled with America’s lead in exploiting the