Notes
should see that firms acquire minority, passive investments classified
as a current asset (securities available for sale and trading securities)
with the intention of selling them when they need cash. The current
market value provides a better indication of the amount of cash the
firm is likely to receive when it sells the marketable securities than
its acquisition cost. The rationale for using market value (rather than
historical cost) for minority, passive investments classified as
noncurrent assets is less because selling them within the next year is
not the firm’s intention. We then ask: Would you think that
acquisition cost or current market value for such investments is more
informative to the user of the financial statements? Students then
begin to understand the market value gives a better indication of how
well the investee is performing and the amount of cash the investor
would receive if it sold the investment.
B. Next, ask why GAAP does not require the use of current market
values for inventories or fixed assets. This is a tougher question for
students. The justification for using market values for marketable
securities applies to inventories as well (that is, both assets are held
for subsequent sale). The only difference that might justify current
GAAP is that current market values for inventories are more difficult
to ascertain, particularly for semi-finished items. Firms typically hold
fixed assets for use in operations rather than for sale, so current
market values might be less relevant for such assets. Measuring
current market values for fixed assets is probably more subjective as
well.
C. Next, ask students to indicate the type of account that the firm might
debit or credit when it revalues marketable securities to market value
each period. The candidates are an income statement account or a
separate shareholder’s equity account. The principal argument for
using an income statement account, at least for marketable securities
classified as a current asset, is the high probability of realizing the
holding gain or loss soon after the end of the accounting period. The
principal argument for using a separate shareholders’ equity account
is that the holding gain or loss is unrealized as of the end of the
accounting period and that the fluctuations in income might distort
analysis of operating activities. Students should see that total
shareholders’ equity will not differ between these two approaches.
The argument for including the unrealized holding gain or loss in
income for trading securities is persuasive because of their short-term
holding period and the acquisition of such securities principally for
their market value changes. These arguments also apply but to a
lesser extent to marketable securities held as available for sale. The
holding period for the latter securities is longer than for trading