Mishkin • Instructor’s Manual for The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets, Twelfth Edition 64
information (not paying your roommate), you have a range of payoffs of $0 to
$10,800 versus $9900 to $10,700 without asymmetric information. Thus, paying a
small amount to improve risk assessment under Option 3 can be very beneficial, a
task for which financial intermediaries are well suited. Option 4, is riskless, so the
expected total payoff is $10,000. If you are more risk averse, Option 4 is likely the
better option. However, if you are more risk neutral then paying your roommate the
$100 to have a minimum $9900 payment and possibly as much as $10,700 is the
better scenario.
ANSWERS TO DATA ANALYSIS PROBLEMS
1. Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database and find data on federal debt held by the
Federal Reserve (FDHBFRBN), by private investors (FDHBPIN), and by international and
foreign investors (FDHBFIN). Using these series, calculate the total amount held and the
percentage held in each of the three categories for the most recent quarter available. Repeat
for the first quarter of 2000, and compare the results.
2. Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database and find data on the total assets of all
commercial banks (TLAACBM027SBOG) and the total assets of money market mutual funds
(MMMFFAQ027S). Transform the commercial bank assets series to quarterly by adjusting
the Frequency setting to “Quarterly.” Calculate the percent increase in growth of assets for
each series, from January 2000 to the most recent quarter available. Which of the two
financial intermediaries has experienced the most growth?
Commercial Banks