Budgeted sales and selling price per unit are as follows:
USA has the opportunity to switch from using the dye it currently uses to using an
environmentally friendly dye that costs $1.25 per ounce. The company would still need 4 ounces
of dye per shirt. USA is reluctant to change because of the increase in costs (and decrease in
profit), but the Environmental Protection Agency has threatened to fine the company $130,000 if
it continues to use the harmful but less expensive dye.
Required:
1. Given the preceding information, would USA be better off financially by switching to the
environmentally friendly dye? (Assume all other costs would remain the same.)
2. Assume USA chooses to be environmentally responsible regardless of cost, and it switches to
the new dye. The production manager suggests trying Kaizen costing. If USA can reduce
fabric and labor costs each by 1% per month on all the shirts it manufactures, by how much
will overall costs decrease at the end of 12 months? (Round to the nearest dollar for
calculating cost reductions.)
3. Refer to requirement 2. How could the reduction in material and labor costs be
accomplished? Are there any problems with this plan?
SOLUTION
(45 min.) Budgeted costs, Kaizen improvements.
1.
Increase in Costs for the Year
Assume US Apparel uses New Dye
Units to dye 50,000
Cost differential ($1.25 – $0.50) per ounce × 4 ounces × $3.00
Increase in costs $150,000
Because the fine is only $130,000, US Apparel would be financially better off by not switching.
1. If US Apparel switches to the new dye, costs will increase by $150,000.
6-4