Three components make up an attitude: beliefs, affect, and behavioral intentions.
We form attitudes several ways.
Attitude researchers traditionally assumed that we learn attitudes in a fixed sequence: First, we
form beliefs (cognitions) about an attitude object, then we evaluate that object (affect), and then
we take some action (behavior). Depending on the consumer’s level of involvement and the
circumstances, though, his attitudes can result from other hierarchies of effects as well. A key to
attitude formation is the function the attitude holds for the consumer (e.g., is it utilitarian or ego
defensive?).
A need to maintain consistency among all of our attitudinal components often motivates us to
alter one or more of them.
One organizing principle of attitude formation is the importance of consistency among attitudinal
components—that is, we alter some parts of an attitude to be in line with others. Such theoretical
approaches to attitudes as cognitive dissonance theory, self-perception theory, and balance
theory stress the vital role of our need for consistency.
Attitude models to identify specific components and combine them to predict a consumer’s
overall attitude toward a product or brand.
Multi-attribute attitude models underscore the complexity of attitudes—they specify that we
identify and combine a set of beliefs and evaluations to predict an overall attitude. Researchers
integrate factors such as subjective norms and the specificity of attitude scales into attitude
measures to improve predictability.
The communications model identifies several important components for marketers when they try
to change consumers’ attitudes toward products and services.
Persuasion refers to an attempt to change consumers’ attitudes. The communications model
specifies the elements marketers need to transmit meaning. These include a source, a message, a
medium, a receiver, and feedback.
The consumer who processes a message is not necessarily the passive receiver of information
marketers once believed him or her to be.
The traditional view of communications regards the perceiver as a passive element in the
process. New developments in interactive communications highlight the need to consider the
active roles a consumer plays when he or she obtains product information and builds a
relationship with a company. Advocates of permission marketing argue that it is more effective to
send messages to consumers who have already indicated an interest in learning about a product
than trying to hit people “cold” with these solicitations.
Several factors influence the effectiveness of a message source.
Two important characteristics that determine the effectiveness of a source are its attractiveness
and credibility. Although celebrities often serve this purpose, their credibility is not always as
strong as marketers hope. Marketing messages that consumers perceive as buzz (those that are
authentic and consumer generated) tend to be more effective than those categorized as hype
(those that are inauthentic, biased, and company generated).
The way a marketer structures his or her message determines how persuasive it will be.
Some elements of a message that help to determine its effectiveness include the following: The
marketer conveys the message in words or pictures; the message employs an emotional or a
rational appeal; how often it’s repeated; whether it draws a conclusion; whether it presents both
sides of the argument; and whether the message includes fear, humor, or sexual references.
Advertising messages often incorporate elements from art or literature, such as dramas, lectures,