Chapter 11: Groups and Social Media
The answer to this question all depends on how “interpersonal” is defined. If the
definition sticks to that of traditional face-to-face communication, then it will be hard to
argue that increased time online does not detract from interpersonal communication.
(15minutes, Chapter Objective 4, AACSB: Analytical Thinking)
11-16. A consumer tribe is similar to a brand community; it is a group of people who share a
lifestyle and can identify with each other because of a shared allegiance to an activity or a
product. Although these tribes are often unstable and short lived, at least for a time
members identify with others through shared emotions, moral beliefs, styles of life, and
of course the products they jointly consume as part of their tribal affiliation. Some
companies, especially those that are more youth-oriented, use a tribal marketing strategy
that links their product to, say, a group of shredders. However, there also are plenty of
tribes with older members, such as car enthusiasts who gather to celebrate cult products
like the Citroën in Europe and the Ford Mustang in the United States, or “foodies” who
share their passion for cooking with other Wolfgang Puck wannabes around the world.
Identify and visit a tribal festival in your area (e.g. a comic book convention, a rock
concert, a basketball tournament, a vegan food show, etc). What role do marketers play in
this event? How and to what extent do attendees identify with other “tribal” members?
Responses will vary based on the tribal event students choose to participate in, but should
(3 -4 hours, Chapter Objective 3, AACSB: Reflective Thinking)
11-17. The Word-of-Mouth Marketing Association recently announced a new set of rules and
guidelines for word-of-mouth advertising. The trade group maintains that marketers must
make sure that people talking up products or services disclose for whom they are
working. They also must use real consumers, not actors, who discuss what they really
believe about a product. The rules were prompted by several controversial incidents such
as a campaign the U.S. arm of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications created for a
camera phone. The company hired 60 actors to hang out at tourist attractions and ask
unsuspecting passersby to take their pictures with the Sony Ericsson devices. The actors
were told to identify themselves only when asked directly. What do you think about
“stealth” campaigns like this? Should marketers be required to disclose their true
intentions when they try to initiate positive word of mouth?
Traditionally, most students will respond that there is nothing wrong or even ethically
questionable about such stealth practices as those described above. Even when they are
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
11-5