2. Individuals who are higher in the personality trait of neuroticism have more trouble
doing so and often find their moods are beyond their ability to control.
3. The workplace environment has an effect on an individual’s tendency to employ
emotion regulation.
4. In general, diversity in work groups increases the likelihood that you will regulate
your emotions.
5. Racial diversity also has an effect: if diversity is low, the minority will engage in
emotion regulation, perhaps to “fit in” with the majority race as much as possible; if
diversity is high and many different races are represented, the majority race will
employ emotion regulation, perhaps to integrate themselves with the whole group.
a. These findings suggest a beneficial outcome of diversity – it may cause us to
regulate our emotions more consciously and effectively.
6. Changing your emotions takes effort, and this effort can be exhausting.
7. From another perspective, research suggests that avoiding negative emotional
experiences is less likely to lead to positive moods than does seeking out positive
emotional experiences.
D. Emotion Regulation Techniques
1. Researchers of emotion regulation often study the strategies people employ to
change their emotions.
a. One technique we have discussed in this chapter is surface acting, or literally
“putting on a face” of appropriate response to a given situation.
b. Surface acting doesn’t change the emotions, though, so the regulation effect is
minimal, and the result of daily surface acting leads to exhaustion and fewer
OCBs.
c. Deep acting, another technique we have covered, is less psychologically costly
than surface acting because the employee is actually trying to experience the
emotion. Emotion regulation through deep acting can have a positive impact on
work outcomes.
E. Ethics of Emotion Regulation
1. One technique of emotion regulation is emotional suppression, or suppressing initial
emotional responses to situations.
a. This response seems to facilitate practical thinking in the short term. However, it
appears to be helpful only when a strongly negative event would illicit a
distressed emotional reaction in a crisis situation.
2. Thus, unless we’re truly in a crisis situation, acknowledging rather than suppressing
our emotional responses to situations, and re-evaluating events after they occur,
yields the best outcomes.
3. Cognitive reappraisal, or reframing our outlook on an emotional situation, is one
way to effectively regulate emotions.
a. This result suggests that cognitive reappraisal may allow people to change their
emotional responses, even when the subject matter is as highly emotionally
charged as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
4. Another technique with potential for emotion regulation is social sharing, or
venting.