24-6
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
24–6 Pyson should determine the materiality of the lawsuits by requesting
from Merrill’s attorneys an assessment of the legal situations and the probable
liabilities involved. In addition, Pyson may have his own attorney assess the
situations. Proper disclosure in the financial statements will depend on the
attorneys’ evaluations of the probable liabilities involved. If the evaluations
indicate highly probable, material amounts, footnote disclosure will be
necessary, assuming the amount of the probable material loss cannot be
reasonably estimated. If the client refuses to make adequate disclosure of the
contingencies, a qualified or adverse opinion may be necessary.
24–8 If an attorney refuses to provide the auditor with information about
material existing lawsuits or likely material unasserted claims, auditing standards
require that the audit opinion be modified to reflect the lack of available
24–9 The major considerations the auditor should take into account in
determining the extent of the subsequent events review are:
The company’s financial strength and stability of earnings
completion of the audit
Changes in key personnel
PCAOB auditing standards require auditors of public companies to
also inquire about changes in internal control over financial reporting
subsequent events are:
Perform cutoff and valuation tests of various balances and related
transactions; e.g., sales cutoff tests
Inquire of management about any subsequent events