52 CHAPTER 5 DE S I G N O F GO O D S A N D SE R V I C E S
10. A bill of material lists the components, their description, and
the quantity of each required to make one unit of the product.
11. An engineering drawing shows the dimensions, tolerances,
matrials, and finishes of a component.
12. An assembly chart shows in schematic form how a product
is assembled. Along with a list of the operations necessary to pro-
duce a component, the process sheet includes specific methods of
13. The moment of truth is the moment that exemplifies,
detracts from, or enhances the customer’s expectations.
14. House of quality is a rigorous method aimed at that specific
result. It identifies customer wants, and relates them to product
attributes and firm abilities. It orders the wants and measures the
15. CAD aids all three strategy concepts—differentiation, low
cost, and response.
◼ CAD allows more designs to be developed, evaluated, and
submitted to production faster. It does this by fostering
16. Process chain is a sequence of steps that accomplishes a
purpose by providing value to process participants.
17. Direct interactions in PCN analysis are those steps that
involve interaction between participants. Surrogate interaction in
PCN analysis includes process steps in which one participant is
18. Documents for releasing services for production are analo-
gous to those for tangible products. The product must be defined—
such as a recipe for a cook, job instructions for a tailor, or a tele-
phone script for telephone sales. The definition is followed by an
authorization to produce. Orders to produce may be in the form
the following comes from an unknown source and some from the
U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission.)
Parker Brothers had big plans for a toy called Riviton.
Riviton consisted of plastic parts, rubber rivets, and a riveting tool
with which children could put together anything from a windmill
to an airplane. In the first year on the market, Riviton seemed on
its way to becoming one of those classic toys that parents would
buy everlastingly. However, one of the 450,000 Riviton sets
ended up under the Christmas tree of an 8-year-old boy. He
played with it daily for 3 weeks. Then he put one of the quarter–
inch-long rubber rivets into his mouth and choked to death. Ten
months later, with Riviton sales well on their way to an expected
$8.5 million for the year, a second child strangled on a rivet.
Parker Brothers could have ignored the strangulations, as-
cribed the deaths to chance, and tried to shift the blame to parental
failure to supervise and police their children at play; or it could have
assigned responsibility to the child’s abnormal misuse or abuse of
the product. “After all, peanuts are the greatest cause of strangula–
tion among children, and nobody advocates the banning of the
However, when you manufacture for children, you produce
for the improvident, the impetuous, and the irresponsible. As a
judge put it: “the concept of a prudent child, God forbid, is a
grotesque combination.” The motto of childhood seems to be
“When in doubt, eat it.” Knowledge of such childish propensity is
Cases abound to document this axiom.
Considering the many stakeholders of a firm and the legal
setting sketched above, what is the proper response for the ethical
dilemma in the text?
the company was sensitive not only to the constraints of the law
(liability follows the chain for defective products) but also to the
imperatives of moral duty and social responsibility, as well as the
commercial value of an untarnished public image. Parker
Brothers, with 125,000 units in inventory, decided to halt sales
and recall 900,000 Riviton sets. As the company president
death No. 3?” The conduct of Parker Brothers is commendable.
However, we can assume that Parker Brothers was in better
financial condition than the manufacturer in our Ethical Dilemma.
Our manufacturer will be “laying off” his employees while further
product refinement takes place or new products are developed.
1. For what range of probabilities of high sales should we pur-
chase the CAD system?
Any probability above .27
2. “Favorable market sales” has been defined as 25,000 units.
Suppose this is optimistic. At what value would we change our de-
cision and hire engineers?
19,200
3. “Unfavorable market sales” has been defined as 8,000 units.
Suppose this is optimistic. At what value would we change our de–
cision and hire engineers?
4,100