3. Validity generalization stands as an alternative for validating selection
methods for companies that cannot employ criterion-related or content
validation.
D. Utility is the degree to which the information provided by selection methods
enhances the effectiveness of selecting personnel in real organizations. Utility is
impacted by reliability, validity, and generalizability. Other factors will influence
utility even when the latter is constant. For example, the selection ratio, which is
the percentage of people tested versus the total number of applicants, will impact
utility as well as the number of people selected (more people increase utility), race
of employee turnover, and level of performance among chose who leave (to
increase utility, turnover should be low with those leaving in low-performance
categories). (See Figure 6.4 a & b).
Evidence Based HR
Recent research evidence indicates that previous assumptions concerning the nature of the
statistical distribution of worker performance appear to be wrong. Previous analyses were based
on an assumption that performance takes the form of a normal distribution, whereas data
collected from over 600,000 employees take the form of a power law distribution. One example
of problems associated with that assumption is in the analysis of the difference in dollar value
between a “highly productive” worker and an “average worker” using the normal distribution is
$11,327 whereas that difference based on a power law distribution is $39,645 – and this is per
employee…
Exercise
Have the class break into small groups, perhaps of three to four students each. Ask them to
research the number of employees in larger corporations. Using the differences in dollar values
provided in the scenario, have them determine the potential loss in value to a company if various
percentages (e.g. 5%, 10%, 20% and 25%) of their employees were hired under erroneous
assumptions (i.e. hired under the assumption of a normal verses a power law distribution).
E. Legality—All selection methods must conform to existing laws and legal
precedents (Chapter 4 discusses these issues).
1. Federal Legislation—The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (an extension of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964) protects individuals from discrimination based
on race, color, sex, religion, and national origin with respect to hiring as
well as compensation and working conditions. The 1991 act differs from
the 1964 act in three different areas:
a. It defines employers’ explicit obligation to establish the business
necessity of any neutral-appearing selection method that has an
adverse impact on protected groups.