whole or part.
IM APP 2-28
INFORMATIVE PRESENTATION PEER CRITIQUE
Student’s Name: Date:
Assigned time: Length: Within Time Limits? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Title: Grade:
Introduction:
What was done to arouse the audience’s attention/interest?
ask a question tell a story use of humor
give a quotation make startling statement other:
refer to the audience refer to the occasion
Was the audience given a reason to listen?
Was a proper tone established?
Were your qualifications established, or was your credibility shown nonverbally?
Was the thesis clear, and was a preview given?
Body:
Was the presentation clearly organized?
Did the organizational pattern clearly indicate the location and significance of the
major ideas?
Were the major points supported with clear evidence?
Was the presentation effectively illustrated, with ideas flowing smoothly?
Was the choice of language clear, effective, and appropriate?
Were there clear transitions that promoted clarity, emphasized important ideas,
and kept listeners interested?
Delivery:
Was there effective eye contact?
Were bodily movement/gestures natural and suitable?
Were the rate and volume and vocal characteristics effective?
Conclusion:
Was the information clearly and concisely reviewed or summarized?
Was there an appropriate close so the speech didn’t just end?
What technique was used to conclude?
whole or part.
IM APP 2-29
ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM*
Student Name __________________
Purpose: After hearing my presentation, the audience will__________________________
Organizational Pattern (see Chapter 11) _________________________________________
1. STRATEGY AND TOPIC
(5) 1.1 Topic chosen and delivered in manner appropriate for audience, speaker, occasion
(5) 1.2 —Specific purpose worded correctly
—describes desired audience reaction
—specific
—realistic
(5) 1.3 Appeals to interests of the audience
(5) 1.4 Stays within time limit
(5) 1.5 Conforms to assignment (format, content)
2. ORGANIZATION AND SUPPORT
(5) 2.1 Introduction
—captures attention of audience
—gives audience reasons to listen
—sets appropriate tone
—builds credibility (if necessary)
—states thesis (unless deferred with hostile audience)
—previews main points
(10) 2.2 Organization
—uses effective organizational pattern (from Chapter 11)
—body of presentation has 2-5 main points
—all material contributes to thesis and purpose
—each main point worded as a claim
(5) 2.3 Presentation contains sufficient information from research; demonstrates
speaker’s command of material
(10) 2.4 Supporting material
—each point has at least one piece of supporting material
—supporting material adds interest, clarity, and proof
—chooses and uses supporting material effectively:
_____ examples _____ comparison _____ citations
_____ stories _____ statistics
whole or part.
Best media formats chosen to present supporting material
_____ objects/models _____ photographs/diagrams _____ handouts
_____ lists/tables _____ charts/graphs
(10) 2.5 PowerPoint and other presentation media used effectively
—includes title slide, preview slide, and slides for key ideas
—information on slides helps achieve purpose of presentation
—information well designed
– 7 x 7 rule followed (short phrases, maximum of 7 lines)
– parallel style
– correct punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
– appropriate background
– includes art and/or chart
– consistent animation and transitions
—material presented smoothly
—submitted on floppy or Zip disk and in printout (six slides per page)
—other presentation media used, as appropriate
(overhead projector, flip chart/poster board, slides, videotape,
chalkboard, handouts)
(5) 2.6 Transitions show relationship of preceding and following material
—between introduction and body
—between main points in the body
—between the body and conclusion
(5) 2.7 Conclusion
—reviews main points
—effective closing statement
(5) 2.8 Question-and-answer period
—has anticipated and prepared answers for predictable questions
—maintains good relationship with questioners
—restates thesis and/or call for action after final question has been answered
(20) 3. DELIVERY
3.1 Dresses appropriately
3.2 Delivers material in manner appropriate for business presentation
3.3 Keeps eye contact with audience
3.4 Stands and moves effectively
3.5 Speaks extemporaneously
3.6 Speaks with enthusiasm and sincerity
3.7 Uses proper vocabulary and pronunciation
3.8 Speaks loudly and clearly
3.9 Delivers material smoothly, without serious fumbles
* This form was contributed by Ron Adler
whole or part.
IM APP 2-31
INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION OF SPEECH
Speaker’s Name:______________________Topic: ___________________________Time:___________
Criteria for Evaluating Speech
Rating
Detailed Explanation of Ratings
Organization:
Hook leads appropriately into thesis
Thesis clarifies a “teaching point”
Preview clearly signposted
Transitions/main points signposted
Main points follow a logical flow
Conclusion ties back to thesis
Content:
Speaker demonstrates expertise
Three or more expert references cited within the
body of the speech
Speech has narrow focus; each main point is
developed in depth
Variety of types of supporting material are used
(definition; facts; statistics; examples; quotes;
comparisons; mini-stories; demonstrations; other)
Content probes beyond common knowledge
(audience learns something new)
Speaker interprets material for audience so it
comes alive for them
Delivery:
Speech adheres to time limit
Eye contact (look at audience 90% of the time and
glance at notes just 10% of the time; include all
audience members, not just one side of the room)
Oral speaking style (use personal pronouns;
contractions; non-complex sentences)
Vocal & facial variety; energy; enthusiasm
Fluency; pronunciation; articulation; grammar
whole or part.
IM APP 2-32
Criteria for Evaluating Speech
Rating
Detailed Explanation of Ratings
Gestures; posture; body movement
Professional attire
PowerPoint slides follow progression of speech
PowerPoint slides can be easily read (not
cluttered; large font; not overly animated)
Written Materials:
Speaking notes are typed in outline format
Thesis and preview are clearly indicated
Bibliography
ORAL PRESENTATION FEEDBACK*
Student/Group Name: _____________________
Course: Communication 101
Content – 50 points
o Presentation content clearly follows
the written outline given to the instructor.
o Topic is relevant and addresses
assignment specifications.
o Content presented is comprehensive,
accurate, and believable.
o Key points are noted.
o Topic is researched adequately.
Organization/Structure – 20 points
o Presentation is well organized, clear,
and effectively structured.
o Individual presentation is integrated
rather than disjointed.
o There is an introduction to gain the
audience’s attention and explain the
presentation topic.
Style/Presentation – 10 points
o Nonverbal cues/gestures are appropriate to
presentation and flow of ideas.
o Content knowledge/confidence are evident.
o Time was used well, not rushed.
Group Evaluation – 10 points
o Each group member will be rated by the
others in their group in the following
categories (as per rating sheet):
o Commitment
o Participation
o Cooperativeness
o Contribution
o An average of ratings will be done. Based
on the percentage will determine the points
(i.e., 60=6, 70=7, 80=8, 90=9 and 100=1
Audience Participation– 10 points
o Presenter(s) involved the audience and
solicited feedback.
o Questions from audience are effectively
addressed and answered correctly.
Adherence to Time Limit (+ or – 5 points)
o Presenter(s) stayed within allotted time
limit (Failure to do so may result in a
deduction of points)
Items to Hand In – 100 points (Score based on Written Feedback Sheet)
o Cover Sheet
o Paper
o References
Total Points: ________ / 200 points
whole or part.
INFORMATIVE SPEECH WITH POWERPOINT
(INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION FORM)
Speaker’s Name_______________ Elapsed Speaking Time___________________
Topic_______________________________________________________________________
Organization:
_____ hook (attention getter) leads appropriately into thesis
_____ thesis clarifies a “teaching point”
_____ preview clearly signposted
_____ transitions/main points signposted
_____ each main point relates back to thesis
_____ conclusion
Supporting Material (content):
_____speaker’s expertise clarified
_____three or more references cited
_____ supporting material shows intellectual soundness
_____ in-depth support for each main point
_____ variety of types of supporting material
Delivery (nonverbals):
_____ eye contact
_____ extemporaneous style (not reading from notes)
_____ expressiveness (facial & vocal)
_____ appropriate attire
PowerPoint Slides
_____ slides demonstrate simplicity (large font, not crowded, not busy)
_____ design shows consistency throughout
_____ slides follow outline of speech
Outline:
_____thesis
_____preview
_____format
_____list of works cited
Evaluation scale:
+ = exceeds expectations; = meets expectations; – = needs improvement
whole or part.
INFORMATIVE PRESENTATION WITH POWERPOINT
(PEER EVALUATION FORM)
Speaker’s Name___________________ Elapsed Speaking Time__________________
Topic____________________________________
Organization:
Did the speaker clearly state the thesis and preview the main points in the introduction?
List the main points:
Was the organizational pattern of the speech clear to you? Explain your answer.
Supporting Material (content):
Did the speaker state three references out loud in the body of the speech (not just list them at the
beginning or end)?
Did you learn NEW information, or was the content commonsense material that you mostly knew
already? Explain.
Did the speaker illustrate each point with more than one type of supporting material (stories,
statistics, quotes, examples)? Explain.
Did the speaker clarify why this information is relevant to you and to each person in the
audience? Explain.
Delivery (nonverbals):
What were the speaker’s strengths and weaknesses of delivery (eye contact, voice, posture,
gestures)?
PowerPoint Slides
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the PowerPoint slides?
Additional Comments
What will you remember about this speech?
If you have any additional suggestions, questions, or commendations, write them here. You may
continue on the back of this sheet.
whole or part.
INFORMATIVE BRIEFING – CRITIQUE SHEET
Name:
Grade: Time:
Thesis Statement:
CONTENT:
Introduction
Did opening catch attention?
Was subject quickly and clearly established?
Was a specific goal established?
How was the audience motivated to listen?
Was the organizational pattern clearly signposted?
Body
Was the scope sufficiently narrowed?
Did the organizational pattern work for this subject?
Were transitions clear and bold?
Were learning aids employed? If so, how effectively?
Conclusion
Was the speech brought to focus per original signposting?
Did closing words give an appropriate, rounded-out effect?
DELIVERY:
Were language and style appropriate?
Did the speaker create a sense of immediacy with this audience?
Were gestures and actions appropriate?
Were voice and articulation appropriate?
Were there distracting verbal (or nonverbal) idiosyncrasies?
GENERAL COMMENTS:
whole or part.
IM APP 2-37
Observation/Critique of Outside Speaker
Your Name:_____________________ Speaker’s Name:
BACKGROUND:
Physical, chronological, social context: Where? When? Who was in the audience?
Type of presentation: report, briefing, explanation, or training?
Why did you choose this person to observe?
INTRODUCTION:
Describe the opening. What identifiable techniques were used? What purposes of an
introduction were achieved?
BODY:
Describe the organizational pattern used. Was it appropriate and effective?
What kind of verbal or visual support was used? Was it appropriate and effective?
Did the speaker relate to the listeners? How? If not, what would you suggest?
Describe the speaker’s delivery. What were the strong points? Weak points?
CONCLUSION:
How did the speaker end? What techniques were used? Were the two purposes of a
conclusion fulfilled? If not, what would you suggest?
EVALUATION:
What did you learn from this observation that will help you in your own career?
whole or part.
IM APP 2-38
PERSUASIVE PRESENTATION CRITIQUE
Student’s Name: Topic: ___________________ Date: ____
Length: Within Time Limits? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Introduction:
How did the speaker gain the audience’s attention?
What did the speaker do to enhance her or his credibility?
Body:
How was the need or desirability for change established?
Did the speaker support this idea adequately?
Was the plan or change described in sufficient detail?
Did the speaker support this step adequately?
Will the change or plan solve the problem and/or meet the need? If so, how?
Were the future consequences and/or benefits clearly outlined?
Conclusion:
Was a call presented for specific action or attitude change?
Did the conclusion summarize the speaker’s purpose?
Delivery: Use the following scale in rating the speaker’s delivery skills:
4 = Excellent, 3 = Above Average, 2 = Average, 1 = Below Average, 0 = Poor.
Please explain your ratings briefly.
Eye Contact
Directness
Gestures/Nonverbal Behaviors
Language Usage/Word Choice
Rate of Delivery
Use of Voice
Improvements Noted:
Suggestions for Improvement: (on back)
whole or part.
PERSUASIVE PRESENTATION EVALUATION
Name:
Date: Grade: Time:
Scale: 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent 5 = Superior.
Organization
Introduction (includes thesis and preview)
Organizational pattern is appropriate for topic and audience
Conclusion reinforces message
Content
Each main point is supported with two or three types of material
Supporting material is relevant to this audience
Supporting material is interesting; goes beyond common knowledge
Cites at least three authoritative sources
Free from logical fallacies
Incorporates three types of persuasive appeal: logos, ethos, and pathos
Language
Correct grammar, pronunciation, enunciation, word choice
Oral, rather than written, style of language
Free from fillers and “teen talk”
Delivery
Eye contact
Vocal variety
Enthusiasm
Posture, gestures, movement
Visual aids