Chapter 13 – Relevant Information for Special Decisions
13-1
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
Teaching Notes for Chapter 13
In this chapter, students learn to identify information that is relevant to a specific decision
situation and to apply the information in reaching an appropriate decision. Traditional
textbooks frequently imply that whether a cost is relevant to a special decision depends
on whether the cost exhibits fixed or variable behavior. The conceptual flaw in this
approach hinders student understanding of cost behavior and relevance. If you want your
students to understand the relevance of accounting information, you must dispel the
notion that cost behavior determines relevance. Consider a production supervisor’s
salary that is fixed relative to the number of units of product produced. A traditional
approach would suggest that the salary is not relevant to a special order decision because
it is fixed and therefore will remain unchanged regardless of whether the special order is
accepted or rejected. The message implied by this explanation is that fixed costs are not
relevant. Students are confused later to learn that the same cost (a production
supervisor’s salary) may be relevant in deciding whether to make or buy the product. If
the company buys the product, it avoids the costs of producing it, including the
supervisor’s salary. The salary cost is still fixed, but now it is a relevant cost.
Clearly, a fixed cost can be relevant or not relevant. Likewise, a variable cost can be
relevant or not relevant. Consider the cost of direct labor. Direct labor cost is relevant to
a special order decision because it can be avoided by rejecting the special order. Now
change the decision context. Suppose a company is deciding whether to make red or
green chairs. Either color chairs fired or green) requires the same amount of direct labor.
Here, the labor cost is variable but not relevant. As these examples show, there is no
connection between cost behavior and relevance. A cost is relevant to a special decision
if it satisfies two criteria: (1) it is future-oriented, and (2) it differs between the
alternatives available to the decision-maker. These criteria apply regardless of whether
the cost is fixed or variable.
To avoid the confusion associated with using fixed and variable terminology when
identifying costs relevant to special decisions, Chapter 13 uses terminology from the
activity-based costing (ABC) literature to describe the costs involved. We classify costs
into one of four hierarchical categories: (1) unit-level, (2) batch-level, (3) product-level,
and (4) facility-level costs. These cost categories are logically associated with relevance.
For example, because unit-level costs are incurred each time a unit of product is made,
they are relevant to a special order decision about whether additional units should be
made and sold. However, because the number of units of product made and sold does not
affect product-level and facility-level costs, those costs are not relevant to a special order
decision. The hierarchical classification scheme still requires exercising judgment. For
example, whether a batch-level cost is relevant to a special order decision depends upon
whether the additional units would be produced as part of an existing batch or as a
separate batch. Even so, the hierarchical classification scheme is clearer than the cost
behavior approach. While it may be unfamiliar at first, we encourage you to experiment
with the hierarchical classification.
By this point in the course, most students are ready to begin the first class on Chapter
13 with a problem-based learning exercise. Demonstration Problem 13-1 provides an
entertaining introduction to the topic of special decisions. It does not require knowledge