Chapter 05 – Introduction to Valuation: The Time Value of Money
Real-World Tip: Students are often helped by concrete examples
tied to real life. For example, you can illustrate the effect of
compound growth by asking the following question in class:
“Assume you just started a new job and your current annual
salary is $25,000. Suppose the rate of inflation is about 4%
annually for
the next 40 years, and you receive annual cost-of-living increases
tied to the inflation rate. What will your salary be in 40 years?
Most students are happy to hear that their final annual salary
will be 25,000(1.04)40 = $120,025. They are often less happy,
however, when they find that today’s $20,000 automobile will cost
$96,020 under the same assumptions.
This example can be extended in many directions. For example,
you might ask how much their final salary will be should they
receive average raises of 5% annually. The difference is striking:
25,000(1.05)40 = $176,000; or approximately $56,000 in
additional purchasing power in that year alone!
C. A Note about Compound Growth
The interest rate is really just the “growth” rate of money, and the
future value formula can be used more generally to find the future
amount of anything that is expected to grow at a constant rate over
a set number of periods. The book illustrates this with employees
and sales.
Lecture Tip: You may wish to take this opportunity to remind
students that, since compound growth rates are found using only
the beginning and ending values of a series, they convey nothing
about the values in between. For example, a firm may state that
“EPS has grown at a 10% annually compounded rate over the last
decade” in an attempt to impress investors of the quality of
earnings. However, this just depends on EPS in year 1 and year 11.
For example, if EPS in year 1 = $1, then a “10% annually
compounded rate” implies that EPS in year 11 is (1.10)10 = 2.59.
So, the firm could have earned $1 per share 10 years ago, suffered
a string of losses, and then earned $2.59 per share this year.
Clearly, this is not what is implied by management’s statement
above.
5-3