is to maximize the current value per share of the existing stock.
Lecture Tip: The late Roberto Goizueta, former chairman and CEO of
the Coca-Cola Company, wrote an essay entitled “Why Share-Owner
Value?” that appeared in the firm’s 1997 annual report. That essay is
reprinted in full at the end of this material. It is an excellent introduction
to the goal of financial management at any level. It may also be useful to
discuss how Mr. Goizueta’s vision transferred to the stock market’s
valuation of the company. The following article illustrates the difference
in strategy between Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Co during Mr. Goizueta’s
tenure.
“How Coke is Kicking Pepsi’s Can,” Fortune, October 28, 1996.
Coke focused on soft drinks while Pepsi-Co diversified into other areas.
Pepsi-Co’s goal was to double revenues every 5 years, while Mr. Goizueta
focused on return on investment and stock price. The article states that
Goizueta “has created more wealth for stockholders than any other CEO
in history.” In mid-1996, Pepsi-Co sold at 23 times earnings with return
on equity of about 23% and Coke sold at 36 times earnings with a return
on equity of around 55%. The article goes on to discuss the differing
strategies in more detail. It provides a nice validation of Mr. Goizueta’s
remarks in his letter to the shareholders.
Lecture Tip: The validity of this goal assumes “investor rationality.” In
other words, investors in the aggregate prefer more dollars to fewer and
less risk to more. Rational investors will act as risk-averse, return-seekers
in making their purchase and sale decisions. Given different levels of risk
aversion and wealth preferences, the only single goal suitable for all
shareholders is the maximization of their wealth (which is represented by
the value of their holdings of the firm’s common stock).
D. A More General Goal – To maximize the market value of owners’ equity.
Many students think that this means that firms should do “anything” to
maximize stockholder wealth. It is important to point out that unethical
behavior does not ultimately benefit owners.
Ethics Note: Any number of ethical issues can be introduced for
discussion – several of which are discussed in more detail in later
sections. One particularly good opener to this topic is the issue of the
responsibility of the managers and stockholders of tobacco firms. Is it
ethical to sell a product that is known to be addictive and dangerous to the
health of the user even when used as intended? Is the fact that the product
is legal relevant? Do recent court decisions against the companies