8
the media and their impression of whether they are adversely affected by media violence. Next,
describe students’ personal experiences as anecdotal evidence (perhaps even a Acase study@) that
lacks any comparison or control condition. That is, students might consider how their attitudes and
behaviors might be different without exposure to media violence to highlight the importance of
comparison. Students also may consider the impact of these research findings on their own future
behavior (e.g., additional exposure to violence) and whether society should do more to limit media
violence.
2. The Scientific Method: Ways of Knowing
Very early in the course (in the first or second class session) we have found it useful to have a class
discussion to help students put the scientific method in context as a way of knowing. We center the
discussion on the question, “What is truth and how do we know it?@ The discussion can be done most
efficiently with students responding individually in a large group but students can also work in pairs or in
small groups prior to discussing in a large group. The entire discussion can be completed in as little as
10 or 15 minutes if it is done as one large discussion group. Steps for leading the discussion follow.
Step 1. To begin the discussion students are asked to respond to variations of a question such as “How
do you know something is true?” and “What institutions in our society claim to tell us things that are
true?@ Students typically respond that they know what is true based on personal opinion, public
opinion, or what they have been taught is true. Students identify several societal institutions that claim
to tell us things that are true. The institutions typically include education, government, the legal system,
religion, and the media. The students frequently generate science as one of the institutions; when they
do not, we either prompt students to elicit science as a response or simply add science to the list.
Step 2. In the second phase, one of the institutions from the list is selected. We have found that the
legal system works especially well for this phase. The students are to identify for the selected institution
(1) an assumption made in seeking truth; (2) rules or guidelines in seeking evidence for truth; and (3) a
decision rule for claiming truth. For the legal system, students relatively quickly identify the three
characteristics. The assumption they describe is that the accused is presumed innocent. They describe
guidelines for seeking evidence such as search warrants and rules for presenting evidence in court.
Finally, they identify the decision rule used in criminal cases of Aguilty beyond a reasonable doubt.@
Step 3. The discussion can conclude by noting that science, like the legal system and other societal
institutions, is guided by assumptions, rules of evidence, and decision rules. The research methods
course provides an introduction to the scientific method. We encourage students to begin their research
methods course with the idea that the scientific method is one of many ways of knowing truth.
3. Students= Experiences as Research Participants
Many students experienced being research participants when they enrolled in introductory psychology.
Colleges and universities commonly ask introductory psychology students to be part of a Aparticipant
pool@ and volunteer for various research projects conducted by faculty and students at the institution.
Students can be asked to share their experiences as research participants. What did they learn about
psychological research through their participation? What did it feel like to be a Asubject@ of a study?
How were they treated by researchers? Their responses may raise ethical issues associated with
research participation, which are addressed more fully in Chapter 3.
4. Reports of Psychological Research in the Popular Press