Chapter 12 – Strategy and the Analysis of Capital Investments
in Case Exhibit 5, the direct costs include the store closing costs of $500,000 plus the lease termination
costs. The lease termination costs include the $100,000 penalty along with the present value of lease costs
for the remaining five years of the lease as calculated below:
$1.298 million in opportunity costs).
Students can now combine the ‘stand-alone’ economics to determine the NPVs for each of the investment
options for the Park Hill area.
(Note: In reviewing the analysis with students, the instructor can underscore the point that CLM
needs to use NPV as the investment standard rather than IRR because the NPVs for the individual
store options can be added together to determine the overall profitability of the option. Since IRR
violates the ‘additive principle’, one cannot accurately compare the options using the IRR criteria).
In order to develop the NPV for the various combined options from the stand-alone economics in the
appendices, students need to recall that the ‘stand-alone’ economics for a store remodel or expansion are
presented in incremental terms. For example, the NPV for the conversion of the Park Hill store to a
superstore is $0.838 million as illustrated in Appendix II. This $.838 million is the incremental NPV on
the incremental amount of $8 million. In order to determine the ‘absolute’ or ‘total’ NPV for the Park Hill
Superstore, students have to add the $0.838 in Appendix II to the NPV for the base case (no investment)
from Appendix I, which is $3.492 million. Hence, the ‘absolute’ or ‘total’ NPV for the conversion of the
Park Hill store to a superstore is $4.33 million. Likewise, the incremental NPV for expanding the Webster
store is ($1.005 million) as shown in Appendix XI. When this incremental NPV is combined with the
NPV for the base case of no investment as listed in Appendix X, students can see that the ‘absolute’ or
‘total’ NPV for expanding the Webster store is $1.107 million. In order to compare the various store
investment options for CLM, students need to convert from incremental ‘stand-alone’ NPV’s to ‘absolute’
or ‘total’ NPVs. The ‘absolute’ or ‘total’ NPVs for each of the options is calculated as follows:
Option 1 – do nothing to both stores: Added value is $5.60 million. This number is the sum of the NPV
12-13
Education.
Year Lease Cost PV Factor (5%) PV
1 $79,400 .9524 $75,619
2 $82,576 .9070 $74,899