Chapter 04 – Market Failures: Public Goods and Externalities
D. Direct government controls or taxes may be needed to reduce negative externalities, or
provide subsidies or government provision where positive externalities exist.
1. Direct controls place limits on the amount of the offensive activity that can occur. Clean
air and water legislation are examples. The effect is to force the offenders to incur costs
associated with pollution control. This should shift the product supply curve leftward and
reduce the equilibrium quantity. Therefore, it should reduce the resource allocation in a
socially optimal way. (See Figure 4.7a)
2. Specific taxes can be levied on polluters. The tax payment will increase costs to the
producer, shifting the product supply curve leftward, and reducing resource allocation to
this type of production as desired and increasing the equilibrium price. (See Figure 4.7b)
3. Subsidies and government provision suggest three options.
a. Buyers may be subsidized. For example, new parents may be given coupons to
receive inoculations at reduced prices for their children. This would increase the
number of vaccinations and eliminate the under allocation of resources. (Figures 4.8a
and 4.8b)
b. Producers could be subsidized so that producers’ costs are reduced, thus shifting the
supply curve rightward, increasing equilibrium output, and eliminating the under
allocation shown in Figure 4.8c.
c. The government could provide the product as a public good where spillover benefits
are extremely large. An example would be administering free vaccines to all children
in India to end smallpox.
E. Table 4.5 reviews the methods for correcting externalities.
F. Society’s optimal amount of externality reduction is not necessarily total elimination.
1. To determine the correct amount of negative externalities like pollution, it’s necessary to
find the point where the MC of cleaning it up equals the MB of cleaner air.
2. The cost of reducing spillover costs increases with each additional unit of reduction. The
benefit received from each additional unit of reduction decreases due to diminishing
marginal utility.
3. When MC=MB, society has found its optimal amount of pollution abatement (Figure
4.9).
4. In reality it is difficult to measure benefits as well as costs, but this analysis demonstrates
that some degree of pollution may be socially efficient.
VII. Government’s Role in the Economy
A. This chapter has shown that government can have a positive role in a market economy by
providing public goods and correcting for over- and under-allocation of resources when there
are externalities.
B. Identifying and correcting for market failures can be difficult, time consuming, and costly.
C. Introducing politics into the equation complicates the situation even more and can lead to
undesirable economic outcomes.
1. In the political environment, there can be over– and under regulation.
2. Public and quasi-public goods may be produced because of powerful politicians, not
because the benefits of the good exceed its costs.
3. Without a profit incentive, government is often inefficient.
D. Government failure is the term used to describe inefficient outcomes as a result of
shortcomings in the public sector.
VIII. Last Word…Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Cap-and-Trade, and Carbon Taxes
4-8
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.