978-0077660772 Chapter 20 Solution Manual Part 2

Chapter 20 – International Trade

10. Suppose that the current international price of wheat is $6 per bushel and that the United

States is currently exporting 30 million bushels per year. If the United States suddenly became a

closed economy with respect to wheat, would the domestic price of wheat in the United States

end up higher or lower than $6? LO3

a. Higher.

b. Lower.

c. The same.

Feedback: If the United States suddenly became a closed economy, the domestic price of

wheat would end up being lower than the current international price of wheat.

11. Suppose that if Iceland and Japan were both closed economies, the domestic price of fish

would be $100 per ton in Iceland and $90 per ton in Japan. If the two countries decided to open

up to international trade with each other, which of the following could be the equilibrium

international price of fish once they begin trading? LO3

a. $75.

b. $85.

c. $95.

d. $105.

Feedback: The correct answer is that $95 could be the equilibrium international price of

fish if Iceland and Japan began trading fish with each other.

20-1

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

12. Draw a domestic supply-and-demand diagram for a product in which the United States does

not have a comparative advantage. What impact do foreign imports have on domestic price and

quantity? On your diagram show a protective tariff that eliminates approximately one-half of the

assumed imports. What are the price-quantity effects of this tariff on (a) domestic consumers, (b)

domestic producers, and (c) foreign exporters? How would the effects of a quota that creates the

same amount of imports differ? LO4

Answer:

The United States does not have a comparative advantage in this product so the

world price Pworld is below the U.S. domestic price of Pdomestic. Imports will reduce

the domestic price, increasing consumption from nontrade, and decreasing

13. American apparel makers complain to Congress about competition from China. Congress

decides to impose either a tariff or a quota on apparel imports from China. Which policy would

Chinese apparel manufacturers prefer? LO4

a. Tariff.

b. Quota.

Feedback: Chinese apparel manufacturers would prefer a quota because it would

generate higher per-unit prices for the goods they sell in the United States.

With either a tariff or a quota, China will see its total volume of sales to the United States

decline. But the question then becomes: Which policy would offer China the greater

20-2

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

PROBLEMS

1. Assume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products—baby formula and tuna fish—are as

follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata:

Canswicki: 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 cans tuna fish

Tunata: 1 can baby formula ≡ 4 cans tuna fish

In what product should each nation specialize? Which of the following terms of trade would be

acceptable to both nations: (a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1/2 cans tuna fish; (b) 1 can baby formula

≡ 1 can tuna fish; (c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish? LO2

Answer: Canswicki should produce baby food, and Tunata should produce tuna; (a)

Feedback: The opportunity cost of producing 1 can of baby formula in Canswicki is 2 cans of

tuna fish.

The opportunity cost of producing 1 can of baby formula in Tunata is 4 cans of tuna fish.

The opportunity cost of producing 1 can of tuna fish in Tunata is 1/4 a can of baby

formula.

Which of the following terms of trade would be acceptable to both nations:

(a) 1 can baby formula ≡ 2 1/2 cans tuna fish?

(b) 1 can baby formula ≡ 1 can tuna fish?

(c) 1 can baby formula ≡ 5 cans tuna fish?

20-3

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

2. The accompanying hypothetical production possibilities tables are for New Zealand and Spain.

Each country can produce apples and plums. Plot the production possibilities data for each of the

two countries separately. Referring to your graphs, answer the following: LO2

a. What is each country’s cost ratio of producing plums and apples?

b. Which nation should specialize in which product?

c. Show the trading possibilities lines for each nation if the actual terms of trade are 1 plum for 2

apples. (Plot these lines on your graph.)

d. Suppose the optimum product mixes before specialization and trade were alternative B in New

Zealand and alternative S in Spain. What would be the gains from specialization and trade?

Answer: a. New Zealand: cost of producing 1 apple is 0.25 plums; cost of producing 1

20-4

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

Feedback: a. The opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in New Zealand is 0.25 plums.

That is, for each apple produced in New Zealand the country must give up 0.25 plums.

The opportunity cost of producing 1 apple in Spain is 1 plum. That is, for each apple

b. The opportunity cost of producing apples in New Zealand is lower than Spain’s

c. The graphs below show the each country’s production possibilities schedules with and

without trade. Apples are on the vertical axis and plums are on the horizontal axis.

20-5

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

The same logic applies to Spain. Before trade the vertical intercept is 60 apples and the

horizontal intercept 60 plums. The slope of the production possibilities schedule is -1,

(NOTE: The intercepts above reflect possibilities not actual equilibrium consumption

bundles. For example, if Spain produced only plums and traded these for apples, they

should be able to consume 120 apples (vertical intercept after trade). The problem is that

New Zealand is only producing 60 apples (the most it possibly can). This is not a flaw in

the logic of the problem because we are only considering the construction of the

production possibilities schedules. The next step would be to allow terms of trade to

adjust in response to shortages and surpluses of goods based on country preferences. We

do not do this step here.)

d. The first step is to determine total production before any trade takes place.

New Zealand’s optimal product mix before trade is alternative B (given above):

Apples = 20

Plums = 10

Spain’s optimal product mix before trade is alternative S (given above):

Apples = 20

Plums = 40

20-6

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

Combined, the optimal mix before trade is:

The next step is to determine total production after specialization. Recall New Zealand

will specialize in apple production (produce only apples) and Spain will specialize in

plum production (produce only plums).

The final step is to determine the total gain for each good, which is the difference

between total production before trade and total production after trade.

3. The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States.

Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B

and for the United States is alternative U. LO2

a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize? If so, what product

should each produce?

b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such

specialization?

c. What are the limits of the terms of trade? Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of

apparel for 1½ units of chemicals and that 4 units of apparel are exchanged for 6 units of

chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?

Answer: a. Yes; China should produce apparel and the United States should produce

chemicals.

Feedback:

a. Yes, the two areas should specialize.

20-7

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

b. The first step is to determine total production before any trade takes place.

The United States’ optimal product mix before trade is alternative U (given above):

Combined, the optimal mix before trade is:

The next step is to determine total production after specialization. Recall China will

The final step is to determine the total gain for each good, which is the difference

between total production before trade and total production after trade.

c. To determine the limits of the terms of trade we look at opportunity cost. The

opportunity cost of producing 1000 units of apparel is 1 ton of chemicals in China. The

Now assuming the actual terms are 1000 units of apparel for 1.5 tons of chemicals and

that the ACTUAL amount traded (exchange) is 4000 units of apparel for 6 tons of

chemicals we can find the new consumption levels for each country.

4. Refer to Figure 3.6, page 63. Assume that the graph depicts the U.S. domestic market for corn.

How many bushels of corn, if any, will the United States export or import at a world price of $1,

$2, $3, $4, and $5? Use this information to construct the U.S. export supply curve and import

demand curve for corn. Suppose that the only other corn-producing nation is France, where the

domestic price is $4. Which country will export corn; which county will import it? LO3

20-8

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter 20 – International Trade

Feedback:

To calculate the amount of imports or exports subtract quantity supplied from the

quantity demanded at each price:

Price $2: 4,000 – 11,000 = -7,000

20-9

consent of McGraw-Hill Education.