Chapter 19 – Current Issues in Macro Theory and Policy
COMMENTS AND TEACHING SUGGESTIONS
1. This chapter illuminates basic disagreements and controversies in macroeconomic theory. Stress
that, despite the disagreements, there is considerable agreement about the basic macro concepts, the
tools of analysis, and the framework for discussion.
2. This may be a good time to reemphasize the difference between positive and normative economics.
Remind students that value judgments about the economy (i.e., which economic goals are
perceived to be most important) influence opinions about a particular economic policy, as much as
any empirical data.
3. Ask students to evaluate the last presidential election, or the views of new candidates vying for the
presidency. Can they identify the school of thought most closely associated with each candidate
for president? Consider the candidates for local elective office; is there enough information
available to make a judgment about the candidates’ opinions about economic policies?
4. Mainstream economists believe that nominal wages are inflexible downward because of labor
contracts, efficiency wages, and insider-outsider relationships. Have students interview a business
manager with first-hand experience in this area; or ask students to consider what kind of empirical
data they would need to collect to evaluate the flexibility or inflexibility of wages.
5. Arthur Okun published a work in the 1960s that is still a good basis for discussion, Equality and
Efficiency, the Big Tradeoff.
6. In discussing Rational Expectations Theory, the following “Concept Illustration” may be useful. It
appeared on the website for the previous edition in the “Analogies, Anecdotes, and Insights”
section.
Concept Illustration … Rational Expectations
The following story illustrates forward-looking behavior, which is part of the theory of rational
expectations.
When Lucas Sargent declared his college major, he sketched out a plan for his courses for the next
two or three years. He based his plan on the course requirements set out in the university catalog
and his expectation that these requirements would continue.
Also suppose that a very difficult, poorly designed course is required in Lucas’s major. Everyone is
complaining about the course, but since it is required, Lucas decides to stay with his plan and
register for it for the second term. Many other majors do the same thing.
Next, suppose that the word gets out that the faculty has voted to eliminate this requirement for the
major. This curriculum change, however, must go through university procedures and thus will not
be finalized until next year. Lucas visits with other students and concludes that this change will
most likely happen. He therefore changes his registration for the second term, substituting another
course for the one in question. Because many other students also opt out, registration for the
course plummets for the second term, surprising the faculty.
Lucas and the other students initially registered for this course based on a particular expectation
about the future: that the course would be required. The policy change produced a new expectation
about the future: that the course would no longer be required. This new expectation led students to
alter their present behavior. Lucas and his fellow students changed their current behavior based on
rational expectations.
19-2
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.