Chapter 03 – Doing Business in Global Markets
3-92
bonus case 3-2
GAP’S EVOLVING VIEW OF ETHICS
In the 1990s, shoe and clothing retailers faced a flood of stories focusing on wage and safety vio-
lations in their overseas factories. Did Nike use child labor? Were Kathy Lee’s sweaters produced in
“sweatshops”? Companies were forced to confront critics and repair the damage to their reputations.
The first reaction of Gap, the corporate parent of Old Navy and Banana Republic, was to clam up
and go into fix-it mode. It built an elaborate monitoring system, which performs more than 8,500 factory
black box, we now have a window into data that can really help us make a judgment on how the company
is progressing in handling of these issues,” says Conrad MacKerron, a director at As You Sow, a nonprof-
it shareholder advocacy group. “This will put pressure on other retailers to do the same.”
In 2006, Gap Inc. was named as one of the “100 Best Corporate Citizens” among major U.S.
companies by Business Ethics magazine.xiii
discussion questions for bonus case 3-2
1. Are you impressed with the effort that Gap has made to respond to the need to have more worker-
friendly suppliers? Would such information lead you to buy more goods from Gap, or are things
like price and quality and value more important?
2. Gap explored wage, health, and safety issues in its plants. What other issues might the company
explore if it wants to ensure the best working conditions possible?
3. If you were a stockholder in Gap Inc., would you be as impressed with its efforts to satisfy the
needs of its workers? Would you be more interested in revenues and profits than good wages and
working conditions? What concerns might a Gap employee working in one of its stores have be-
cause of its social stance?