Table 12.3
G.C.I. is a company with a highly political environment. To survive, managers must be
adept at organizational politics. The company has clear lines of authority, operating
procedures, and company policies. But the CEO confers favors based on whom he likes
at the moment. Performance goals are not clear, career paths are confusing, and what
constitutes success for the company is never clarified; profit, market share, quality,
customer satisfaction, or what. The new marketing director sees that production and
finance have a great deal of power. So he approaches the production director and offers
to work closely with him to avoid creating demand he can’t meet. When the marketing
director has an open personnel position and knows that the production director
desperately needs an assistant, the marketing director surrenders his position to the
production director. Seeing this relationship develop, the finance director begins to give
marketing only direct, selected information. He avoids meeting the marketing director
except in group meetings where there is no opportunity to talk one-on-one. The
marketing director immediately understands what is happening. He decides to enlist the
production director, the sales manager, and the human resource director in a plan to
reduce the finance director’s power or even get him fired.
Refer to Table 12.3. The finance director’s political response to the marketing director’s
actions with the production director is an example of:
A) blaming and attacking others.
B) aligning oneself with more powerful others.
C) playing political games.
D) controlling access to information.
Bank of America has been described as very conservative and slow to innovate or try
new ideas; in contrast, employees at The Limited are discouraged from making ‘safe”
choices. This difference represents which aspect of organizational culture?
A) Willingness to take risks
B) Interest in having employees generate ideas