38. Which landmark case effectively ended the execution of those who committed capital crimes as juveniles?
a. Atkins v. Virginia b. Furman v. Georgia
c. Gregg v. Georgia d. Roper v. Simmons
39. In , the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule that the death penalty inherently violated the Eighth
Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment or the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of due
process, only that it did so as practiced by the states.
a. Atkins v. Virginia b. Furman v. Georgia
c. Gregg v. Georgia d. Roper v. Simmons
40. The Supreme Court made it very difficult to prove discriminatory intent in capital punishment based on statistics
alone in:
a. McCleskey v. Kemp. b. Atkins v. Virginia.
c. Roper v. Simmons. d. Furman v. Georgia.
Case 9-1
Jeremy has just been found guilty by a jury for the crimes of robbery, aggravated assault, and obstruction of justice.
Jeremy has an extensive criminal history. He was previously in prison for burglary and possession of illegal drugs.
When he was arrested for these new crimes of robbery, aggravated assault, and obstruction of justice, he was on
probation for stealing a vehicle.
41. The judge in the case is tired of seeing Jeremy in his courtroom. He is determined to give him the most severe
punishment that the law allows. The judge believes that Jeremy must return to prison because he thinks that is the
only way that he will no longer be a danger to society again. The judge in this case is most likely following the
sentencing philosophy of:
a. retribution.
b. deterrence.
c. incapacitation.
d. rehabilitation.