156 Chapter 7: Equal Protection and the Antidiscrimination Principle
a. 1999
b. 2007
c. 2009
d. 2011
ESSAY QUESTIONS
1. Describe the constitutional debate surrounding the efforts by some state and local governments to
eradicate race and sex discrimination in the membership policies of certain social and civil clubs.
What has the Supreme Court said on the subject?
2. Over the years the U.S. Supreme Court has identified and applied three standards of review—
rational basis, heightened scrutiny, and strict scrutiny—in determining whether various legislative
classifications of persons violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Briefly
describe the distinguishing characteristics of each of these standards of review, including but not
limited to allocation of the burden of proof.
3. Does the general approach to equal protection analysis using three standards of review—rational
basis, heightened scrutiny, and strict scrutiny—make sense? Is it workable? Does it reflect a careful
and fair weighing of constitutional values, or is it arbitrary, artificial, and obsolete? Support your
conclusions.
4. Restate the Supreme Court’s decision and rationale in Brown v. Board of Education I (1954).
Identify and differentiate among the major stages in the Court’s attempt to implement the
requirements of this decision from Brown II (1955) through Missouri v. Jenkins (1995). To what
extent has the Supreme Court clearly and consistently articulated the requirements that must be
fulfilled by school systems in order to achieve full compliance with Brown v. Board of Education?
5. Recall and critique the Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2013).
What level of scrutiny did the Court call for in determining the constitutionality of affirmative
action policy in higher education? Did this ruling clarify constitutional affirmative action policy
in the United States?
6. Despite being somewhat similar in structure, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was far more
successful in guaranteeing equal protection of the law than the Civil Rights Act of 1875. To what
degree, if any, was the Supreme Court responsible for the difference in their effectiveness?
7. Recall and critique the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Virginia (1996). How did the
state argue its policy at VMI was not violative of the constitution and why was this rejected by
the majority in this case? What were the major legal arguments in Justice Scalia’s dissent?