4. Sycamore (a U.S. firm) has no subsidiaries and presently has sales to Mexican customers amounting to MXP98 million,
while its peso-denominated expenses amount to MXP41 million. If it shifts its material orders from its Mexican suppliers
to U.S. suppliers, it could reduce peso-denominated expenses by MXP12 million and increase dollar-denominated
expenses by $800,000. This strategy would ____ Sycamore’s exposure to changes in the peso’s movements against the
U.S. dollar. Regardless of whether the firm shifts expenses, it is likely to perform better when the peso is valued ____
relative to the dollar.
5. Which of the following is an example of economic exposure but not an example of transaction exposure?
An increase in the dollar’s value hurts a U.S. firm’s domestic sales because foreign competitors are able to
increase their sales to U.S. customers.
An increase in the pound’s value increases a U.S. firm‘s cost of British pound payables.
A decrease in the peso’s value decreases a U.S. firm’s dollar value of peso receivables.
A decrease in the Swiss franc’s value decreases the dollar value of interest payments on a Swiss deposit sent to
a U.S. firm by a Swiss bank.
6. Rockford Co. is a U.S. manufacturing firm that produces products in the United States and sells all the products to retail
stores in the United Kingdom; the sales are denominated in pounds. It finances a small portion of its business with pound–
denominated loans from British banks. Which of the following is true? (Assume that the amount of products to be sold is
guaranteed by contracts.)
The dollar value of sales is higher if the pound depreciates against the dollar.
The dollar value of sales is unaffected by the pound’s exchange rate.