72. In 1994 80% of the US public supported capital punishment. In 2013, 63% of Americans were in favor of the death
penalty. A survey of police officers found that 94% favored the death penalty, with 96% of the police giving as the
primary reason that it removed a dangerous person from the population. Another reason given was that capital
punishment serves as a powerful deterrent to murder. In 2010, 88% of the country’s top academic criminological
societies rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder. Do these statistics strongly support
the argument that capital punishment is inappropriate one in the United States today? Can you suggest an alternate
explanation for these statistics?
73. In civil lawsuits, punitive damages are designed to punish a wrongdoer and act as a warning to others not to engage
in similar conduct. For example, an individual might suffer $10,000 in compensatory damages because of lost wages
or medical expenses, but the jury could award $1 million to punish the defendant over and above compensatory
damages. The Eighth Amendment prohibits punishment by excessive fines in criminal cases, but not in civil cases
involving punitive damages. Therefore, the $1 million judgment in the civil suit would, if imposed as a fine by a judge
or jury in a criminal court, likely violate the Eighth Amendment. Do you think this distinction is a relevant one? Why
should punishment by the government be considered different than punishment by an individual?