Timothy Jenkins had been working for six years at Hartford Mills, a company that takes
a strong stand against unionization. Though Timothy’s designation was that of a
production supervisor, as the company grew, he also took on additional duties like
keeping a check on employee safety, ensuring that legal measures are followed, and
implementing programs for labor welfare that the company planned. Many believed
that Timothy was doing a great job for the company, and so it came as a surprise when
Timothy was rumored to face severe disciplinary action, as he was encouraging the
workers to join a union. However, he was let off with a mere warning. Which of the
following, if true, would explain this paradox?
A) The management had recently instituted a formal employee welfare committee.
B) Timothy stressed the fact that he was a meticulous worker who always adhered to
company policies.
C) The management had recently moved from an open shop mechanism to a closed
shop mechanism.
D) Timothy claimed that he was only looking to ensure greater employee welfare,
which was one of the duties the company had assigned to him.
E) Timothy argued that allowing unionization had increased the levels of employee
satisfaction in one of their rival companies.
Which of the following is most likely to be a characteristic of an organization pursuing
a cost-minimization strategy?
A) lack of tight control