83. Reliability in performance appraisal is measured by:
correlating two sets of ratings made by a single rater or by two different raters.
correlating the ratings of an employee at two different points in time.
linking performance standards to organizational goals.
quantifiable performance standards.
84. The Supreme Court ruling states that:
vague performance standards can be acceptable when clearly written.
organizations should have carefully defined and measurable performance standards.
while performance standards should be somewhat specific, there should be room for individual interpretation.
descriptions of traits such as attitude and cooperation are acceptable performance standards.
United States – BUSPROG – Analytic – Business knowledge and analytic skills
United States – OH – DISC: HRM
85. In light of recent court rulings, HR managers suggest that performance evaluations should meet all of the following
legal guidelines EXCEPT:
performance ratings must be job-related.
employees must be provided with clear, written job standards in advance of their evaluations.
performance evaluation should rarely be tied to compensation decisions.
supervisors should be trained to use the evaluation form correctly.
United States – BUSPROG – Analytic – Business knowledge and analytic skills
United States – OH – DISC: HRM
86. In most instances, who is in the best position to perform the function of evaluating an employee’s performance?
The employee’s supervisor
United States – BUSPROG – Analytic – Business knowledge and analytic skills
United States – OH – DISC: HRM