The scenarios below all involve a possible violation of the AICPA’s Code of
Professional Conduct.
1. Using the list below, indicate which of the Code of Conduct Rules applies to the
scenario.
a. Independence
b. Integrity and Objectivity
c. Contingent Fees
d. Acts Discreditable
e. Commissions and Referral Fees
f. Form of Organization and Name
2. State if the scenario is a violation of the Code.
Scenario:
1. Margaret Henry is a partner in the Tupelo office of Jenkins & Thorn, CPAs.
Margaret’s father is the controller at Markrich Sporting Supplies, Inc., a publicly held
company in Tupelo. Markrich is one of Jenkins & Thorn’s audit clients. Margaret is not
involved in the audit of Markrich.
2. Jason Alexander is an audit manager with Reese & Co., CPAs. Jason owns 100 share
of common stock in one of the firm’s audit clients, but he does not provide any audit or
non-audit services to the company.
3. The accounting firm of Fine & Herman, CPAs, provides bookkeeping and tax
services for Henderson Corporation, a privately held company. Mr. Herman also
performs the annual audit of Henderson Corporation.
4. Elaine Cooper, CPA, is the auditor of Paula’s Pizza. Toward the end of the audit,
Paula gave Elaine her estimate of receivable collectability and Elaine accepted it
without any testing.
5. Charley Ray, CPA, is a member of the engagement team that performs the audit of
Desiree Corporation. Charley’s five-year-old daughter, Becky, received ten shares of
Desiree common stock for her fifth birthday in a trust fund established by Becky’s
grandmother.
6. Freeman and Johnson formed a successful CPA practice ten years ago. In the current
year, they approached Adam Sawtooth, a surgeon and medical expert, and asked him to
assist them with their growing medical consulting practice. Sawtooth agreed, but only
after he was given an ownership interest in the firm. Sawtooth does intend to reduce his
private practice hours and spend 40% of his working hours devoted to the Freeman &
Johnson practice.