Public journalism is best thought of as a conversational model for news practice.
Public journalism is driven by citizen forums, community conversations, and even
talk shows.
Before people knew the impact of the Internet, public journalism served as a response
to the many citizens who felt alienated from participating in public life. This
alienation arose, in part, from viewers who watched passively as the political process
seemed to play out in the news and on TV between party operatives and media
pundits. Editors and reporters interested in addressing citizen alienation began
creating ways to engage people as conversational partners in determining the news.
Journalists began sponsoring citizen forums, where readers would have a voice in
shaping aspects of the news that directly affected them.
With the loss of classified ad revenue and the rise of free advertising online,
newspaper executives cut reporting staffs and expensive investigative projects. They
also reduced the print space for news or converted to online-only operations. These
trends limited the range of stories told and the views represented in a community.
Historian Christopher Lasch argued that the job of the press is to encourage debate,
not to supply the public with information. Lasch made an interesting point about how
conventional journalism had lost its bearings. He felt that the early mission of
journalism was to advocate opinions and encourage public debate and that these had
been relegated to alternative magazines, the editorial pages, news blogs, and cable
news channels starring allegedly elite reporters.
Today, more community-oriented journalism and other civic projects offer citizens
an opportunity to deliberate and to influence their leaders.