CHAPTER 11 Labor and Employment Arbitration
Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
25. The first step in the legalistic approach on the arbitration process is to acknowledge that the parties have a mutual
obligation to bring out all relevant facts.
26. The Supreme Court’s Gardner-Denver decision:
Resulted in trial courts overturning discrimination grievances heard by the arbitrators.
Contended that the arbitrator’s expertise pertains to labor agreement interpretation and not to resolving federal
civil rights laws.
Applies only to “reverse-discrimination” grievances (white employees having more seniority who are denied a
promotion filled by a minority employee, for example).
Enables arbitrators, instead of the EEOC and the courts, to resolve a discrimination grievance.
Requires union members to arbitrate claims arising under a federal anti-discrimination statute.
Are nearly always used in arbitration.
Might backfire for the presenting party.
Often preferred by the grievant to guarantee a fair hearing.
Are nearly always used in arbitration and often preferred by the grievant to guarantee a fair hearing.
Last from a few hours to a few days.
28. Before World War II, the arbitrator’s decision largely relied on:
Criminal convictions under the National Arbitration Act of 1902.
The National Labor Relations Board for enforcement.
Diplomatic and persuasive abilities to convince the parties that the decision should be accepted.
The National Labor Relations Board for enforcement and criminal convictions under the National Arbitration
Act of 1902.
Is promulgated by the employer to resolve statutory claims.
Gives the employer the dominant power.
Allows the employer to unilaterally design the procedures and determines that disputes related to employment
subjects will be resolved in arbitration.
Provided for final resolution of disputes interrupting work that contributed to the war effort.
The decision of the arbitrator involves interpretation and application of company-developed personnel policy
or a public law.