Identify any type of fallacy in the following passage.
From a column by Suzanne Fields, in the
Washington Post
, after George W. Bush had
given a speech at Bob Jones University (well known for its anti-Catholic stance) and been
attacked for it by fellow Republican John McCain:
“John McCain’s attacks on George W. as an anti-Catholic bigot are over the line…. The
governor of Texas made mistakes at Bob Jones University. He admitted them. He wasted
an important opportunity to rebuke Bob Jones’ anti-Catholicism and its ban on interracial
dating…. His performance and prominence there was ill thought-out, but it doesn’t prove
bigotry. It was also the height of hypocrisy when Mr. McCain exempted his supporter Rep.
Lindsey Graham from similar criticism for his accepting an honorary degree from Bob
Jones U., and not uttering a single syllable of criticism.”
Is the last sentence an example of ad hominem fallacy or common practice fallacy in
defense of George Bush, or is it merely a request for fair play?
Identify the type of fallacy in the following passage.
“My students’ scores have improved dramatically since I started giving tests online, which
indicates that students learn more on online courses.”
Cum hoc, ergo propter hoc
(or
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
, depending on how you analyze
it).