VIII. CONCLUSION
A. The opening section of the chapter defined political culture and then discussed
two approaches to using political culture in the study of comparative politics.
1. The civic culture approach suggests that a mix of citizens with different levels
of participation and interest in politics helps maintain a balance between
keeping governments responsive to citizens and allowing them to operate
without undue disruption and instability.
2. Self-expression approach explains that economic development and social
change contribute to the emergence of self-expression values.
a. These values motivate individuals to challenge authoritarian rule and
demand democracy.
b. They also motivate citizens to demand effective and accountable
government once democracy is established.
3. Also examined is the concept of social capital
a. It explains how social networks and social trust enable individuals to
engage in collective action to challenge authoritarian rule.
b. It helps explain how high levels of social trust enable people to work
together.
c. It is correlated with more effective and accountable democratic
government and with more equal distribution of capabilities in countries.
B. The next section examined three forms of political identity: ethnicity, nationalism,
and religion.
1. In many countries, these political identities can be accommodated peacefully.
In others, identity politics has led to tensions and even to violence.
2. The three main ways of explaining such violence are primordialism,
instrumentalism, and constructivism.
a. Primordial explanations blame the violence on ancient rivalries and hatred.
b. Instrumental explanations assume violence is the result of manipulation by
political leaders for political gain.
c. Constructivism argues that identities are socially constructed, rather than
being inherent in human nature, and that conflict results from the
successful efforts of instigators to link particular incidents or rumors to a
country’s socially constructed master cleavage.
C. The final section tested the hypothesis that higher levels of social trust in a
country are associated with higher levels of capabilities.
1. The hypothesis was supported to various degrees for infant mortality, literacy,
homicide, and democracy.
2. In each test of the hypothesis there were outlying countries, which suggests
that other variables in addition to social trust can be important in determining
levels of infant mortality, literacy, homicide, and democracy.
89