Learning Objective: LO 15.6: Evaluate the historical process of school
integration and the current state of affirmative action.
Page Reference: 468
Skill Level: Analyze It
Difficulty Level: Moderate
59. What factors have prevented Hispanics from translating their numbers into
comparable political clout?
a. political differences among them, and the fact that many are not citizens or
registered to vote
b. programs like “Operation Wetback” and the “show me your papers” provision
in Arizona
c. the facts that many of them are not citizens or registered to vote, and many are
illiterate
d. their recent arrival in the United States, and the fact that many have not learned
to speak English
Topic: The Quest for Equal Justice
Learning Objective: LO 15.2: Compare and contrast the efforts of various
groups to obtain equal protection of the law.
Page Reference: 454
Skill Level: Analyze It
Difficulty Level: Difficult
60. Why did the Supreme Court strike down an affirmative action program in Gratz v.
Bollinger (2003) but uphold a different affirmative action program in Grutter v.
Bollinger (2003)?
a. The Gratz program was predicated on promoting diversity, while the Grutter
program was predicated on remedying past discrimination.
b. The Gratz program used race as a “plus factor,” while the Grutter program
relied on a race-based quota system.
c. The Gratz program used a mechanical, point-based system, while the Grutter
program used race as part of an individualized, holistic review.
d. The Gratz program classified applicants by race, while the Grutter program
classified applicants by ethnicity.
Topic: Education Rights
Learning Objective: LO 15.6: Evaluate the historical process of school
integration and the current state of affirmative action.
Page Reference: 468 – 469
526