Using reasoning
• Reasoning is the line of thought that connects the facts you present and the conclusions
that you draw from those facts.
• Persuasive speakers typically use inductive reasoning, which follows a similar process
of generalizing from facts, instances, or examples.
• There are four types of inductive reasoning:
o Example reasoning
o When you use example reasoning, you present specific instances to
support a general claim.
o To use example reasoning skillfully, be sure to provide enough instances
o Comparison reasoning
o When you use comparison reasoning, also known as analogy
reasoning, you argue that two instances are similar, so that what you
know is true for one instance is likely to be true for the other.
o For comparison reasoning to work, your audience must agree (or be
persuaded) that the two instances are in fact comparable.
o Sign reasoning
o When you use sign reasoning, you claim that a fact is true because
indirect indicators (signs) are consistent with that fact.
Avoiding logical fallacies
• Hasty generalization: A hasty generalization occurs when a speaker bases a conclusion
on limited or unrepresentative examples.
• Causal reasoning errors
o One common error in causal reasoning is the post hoc fallacy, which lies in the
assumption that because one event followed another, the first event caused the
second.
o Also watch out for reversed causality, in which speakers miss the fact that the
effect is actually the cause.
• Ad populum fallacy: You’ve committed the ad populum (bandwagon) fallacy if you
assume that a statement is true or false simply because many people say that it is.