CHAPTER 12
TEAM PRESSURES AND CONFLICTS:
MEETING THE CHALLENGES
At this point in their work, students will have begun to see some of the problems in group
processes. This chapter takes them into a study of those problems with pressures on deviants,
conformity, groupthink, hidden agendas, competitive communication and game playing, conflict,
Chapter Outline
Team Pressures
Deviance
Conformity
Motives
Methods
Choices
Responses
Groupware and Virtual Meeting Influences
Groupthink
How Groupthink Happens
Cohesiveness
Structure
Situation
Leadership
What Groupthink Does
How to Reduce Groupthink
Competitive Communication
How People Play Games
How Games Affect Climate
How to Handle a Game
Conflict
Types of Conflict
Sources of Conflict
Approaches to Conflict Management
Summary
Exercises
Discussion Suggestions For Boxes
Gender and Role Expectations
In the University of Surrey study respondents were more likely to attribute innovative problem
solving styles to female manager than to male. Ask students what more they they would want to
find out about the study to determine its validity. What kind of follow-up study would they like
to see to gain further insight into perceptions of male vs. female management problem solving
styles.
TeamismGranfalloons
This excerpt is from a section that focuses on uses of groups for propaganda. The idea is that the
“granfalloon” makes a group a prime candidate for manipulation on the basis of its ill-conceived
group pride and cohesiveness.
Can You be Comfortable with Conflict?
Based on the John Ford article, American, Canadian, Western European, Australian, and New
Zealand cultures are considered more individualistic than many cultures from other countries.
Collectivist cultures put an important value on the group above the individual.
Talking Points:
How truly individualistic is American culture?
Did the UK’s fight over accepting the Euro as their currency show that it was more
individualistic than its Continental counterparts?
Are there parts of the U.S. more collectivist than others?
Discussion Suggestions for Case Analysis 12.1
Quality Is No “Easy Rider”
One company students are very much aware of is Harley-Davidson. Many are aware that the
company was in trouble and experienced a high-visibility, high-altitude change. Given that
awareness, they should be interested in this excerpt. They may wonder how the Harley-Davidson
culture of teamwork and empowerment reconciles with the notion of confrontation.
Suggestions For Guiding Chapter Exercises
Exercise 1: Conflict Management Assessments
After groups or teams have created their method, set up groups in pairs as in previous exercises.
In each pair, have Team A use Team B’s instrument to assess its conflict management
and have Team B use Team A’s instrument.
Exercise 2: The Games People PlayComparing Narratives
This one is fun. It’s especially good for Syllabus B, because it can lead to a journal assignment
to identify ways in which individuals’ personal experiences have included games that their
groups identified.
Exercise 3: Group Pressure Stories
This is a good journal exercise. Or, you can have students meet in groups to discuss their
experiences with deviance and pressure to conform.
2. From that list, ask students to identify some categories or themes that emerge and to relate
those to the chapter information about deviance and conformity.
Exercise 4
After groups have acted out their groupthink skits, ask the class to identify specifically when and
how groupthink emerged.
1. What communication behaviors indicated that groupthink was occurring? Help students
2. What kinds of pressure did members in the skit put upon each other? Isolate verbal or
3. If the skit didn’t show a conclusion, ask the class what they thought would be the results
of the groupthink. Did the skit indicate closedness, inadequate exploration, and
assessment of risks and options that would lead to bad decisions?
Additional Exercise
CONFLICT IN THE SITCOM
Objective
To analyze conflict as it is played out
Time
1 to 2 hours outside of class; up to 1 hour in class
Materials
2. Alternatively, you can bring in a videotaped sitcom for all to see on a VCR and monitor in
Procedure
1. Give students instruction sheet.
3. Alternatively, have students report to the class what they observed.
Preparation of Materials
Duplicate an instruction sheet as follows:
Instruction Sheet for Conflict in the Sitcom
Select a televised situation comedy that shows conflict among members of a family or some
other group. Watch the show carefully (it is preferable if you can tape it and play it back for this
assignment). Then answer the following questions:
1. What (briefly) was the situation?
2. What were the goals, assumptions, needs of the participants?
3. What kind of conflict was it?
4. What styles of conflict management did the principal characters reveal?
Debriefing
This assignment can be used for a journal or for an in-class exercise (if you bring in the tape).
1. If you debrief it in class, ask students first what sitcoms they used.
3. Have groups report their findings to each other and agree on one example to report to the
class or, if members all reviewed one episode, ask them to synthesize their findings together.
5. Discuss to what extent the sitcoms represented effective or ineffective conflict management.
What did they leave out for sake of time? For the sake of dramatic or comic effect? What would
be different in real life?
Case Study 1: The Church Dance Conflict
The pastor of a church has asked an advisory committee to recommend whether or not to permit
a dance in the social hall.
Of the committee members, Jen leans toward “yes,” Dave tends slightly toward “no,” Sue Ann is
completely unsure. Bob is definitely for it, and Lila is strongly against it.
Bob’s arguments are: The church has no rules against dancing; the town has few social activities
and this will give folksincluding some restless kidssomething to do; it will enhance the
church’s service to the community; it will cost nothing, but will bring in money for the day-care
Questions
1. What are the causes of the conflict between Bob and Lila?
2. What should Jen, Dave, and Sue Ann do? How can this conflict be managed?
Suggestions for Debriefing Case Study 1
1. Help students track through Bob’s and Lila’s arguments and separate what seem to be
emotional/personality issues and what seem to be substantive issues.
Case Study 2: The Social Studies Swindle
The Board of Education in Townsville adopted a new social studies curriculum, spending
$350,000 on a consultant, materials, and teacher training seminars.
The town is in an uproar. The Citizen, a local newspaper, has revealed the curriculum is
fraudulent and the consultant who was paid to design it has fake credentials. Professors from the
nearby university have examined the curriculum and declared that it is factually inaccurate and
pedagogically unsound.
P. T.’s impressive resumé, overhead slides, and startling allegations, the board hired Barnone as a
consultant to design a special curriculum for Townsville’s schools.
The board refused to hear the opinions of the Superintendent of Schools, the Chairperson of the
Social Studies Department, the university professors who normally acted as advisors, and several
parents’ committees. The board said these people were biased.
The Citizen tried to interview members of the board and Consultant Barnone, but was unable to
get anyone to respond.
In accordance with the law, the board held an open meeting. A crowd arrived, Barnone
presented the curriculum, and members of the board spoke in its favor.
Questions
What happened here? Discuss this case in terms of deviance, conformity, cohesiveness, agendas,
and groupthink. Track the chain of behaviors that led to the fiasco.
Suggestions for Debriefing The Social Studies Swindle
1. Have students start with the background; what are the goals and motives of Dayang? What
kinds of assumptions did she make to begin with?
3. Ask students to identify where illusions of superiority, unanimity, and invulnerability crop
up in this story.
Additional Resources
Print resources
Burton, G. E. (1990). The measurement of distortion tendencies induced by the win-lose nature
of in-group loyalty. Small Group Research, 21, 128-141.
Genuario, James and Carr, Charles. (Feb 2008). The role of shared decision making in sports
medicine: putting the “I” back in “team”. (25TH Anniversary SPECIAL SERIES) (Report). The
Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine, 25.2 p63.
Guy, John. (Feb 16, 2009). Are we victims of ‘group think’? (Conference news). Indianapolis
3-14.
Media resources
Dealing with conflict. Carlsbad, CA: CRM Films.
The Abilene paradox. Carlsbad, CA: CRM Films. 28 min.