Narrowing of topic
5 Topic narrowed sufficiently and creatively, allowing the speaker to develop content adequately
4 Topic narrowed sufficiently allowing the speaker to develop content adequately
3 Topic narrowed sufficiently but content not developed adequately for the time allowed
2 Focused topic but tried to cover too much or too little information in the time allowed
1 Unfocused topic
Two or three main points
5 Two or three main points clearly stated and directly linked to the topic
Transitions
5 Clear, interesting transitions between all main points and subpoints in speech
4 Clear, interesting transitions between main points
3 The transitions previewed the next point or reviewed previous point but not both.
2 Implied transitions but unclear
1 No evident use of transitions
Organization
5 Ideas are well organized, there is a clear pattern of thought, and creative language and parallelism
are used.
4 Ideas are organized with a clear pattern of thought and creative language OR parallelism is used.
3 Ideas are loosely organized.
2 There is evidence of an attempt to organize speech, but it is still hard to follow.
1 There is no organization; the speech wanders without structure.
Evidence
5 Various types of evidence; three different sources types were used to support ALL ideas.
4 Various types of evidence were used to support SOME ideas.
Five sources and citations
5 Five sources were clearly cited verbally.
4 Five sources may have been cited but were difficult to identify, OR all five were cited but were
not found within EACH main point of speech.
3 Three or four sources were cited.
2 One or two sources were cited.
1 No sources were cited.