© 2019 by McGraw–Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
we could have had if we’d been able to pursue our ideas one at a time. This got frustrating. It also
affected the quality of our solution.
A related problem resulting from our choice of chat room as a venue was the lack of nonverbal
communication, which created some tension. When we are chatting online there is no paralanguage.
Paralanguage is the study of all cues, which include sound or silence, other than the content of words
Recommendations
I have learned a lot from this project about the strengths and limits of virtual communication. If I could do
this project over again, I would use a variety of modes of communication, not just chat rooms.
Virtual communication does have some advantages in group decision making. For example, due to our
busy schedules and distant locations, our group members couldn’t have completed our task without
technology. I have also learned that people who are timid are more willing to participate in virtual groups
The chat rooms worked fine for simple items, such as choosing a problem, brainstorming, and assigning
tasks. Asynchronous (i.e., not every member is online at the same time) virtual meetings would have been
better for steps that required more thought, such as reporting research results. We would have had more
time to think about these ideas. However, asynchronous discussion areas aren’t a fruitful forum for debate
In future projects like this I will try to choose a group that can get together in person for at least a few of
the meetings. If that’s not possible, then I will assign different technologies, depending on the nature of
the task.
Conclusion
Our group came up with an effective solution to the food bank problem. We showed high commitment
and creativity. We needed to improve our use of technology and nonverbal communication. This
experience has illustrated for me the need and importance of matching the technology to the task. It has
References
Adler, R., & Maresh–Fuehrer, M. (2019). Communicating at work (12th ed). New York: McGraw Hill.