CHAPTER 6: GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS
BRIEF CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. Types of Groups
A. Dyads and Triads: Group Size Effects
B. Primary and Secondary Groups
C. Reference Groups
D. In-Groups, Out-Groups, and Attribution Error
E. Social Networks
F. Social Networks as “Small Worlds”
II. Social Influence in Groups
A. The Asch Conformity Experiment
B. The Milgram Obedience Studies
C. The Iraqi Prisoners at Abu Ghraib: Research Predicts Reality?
1. Understand the sociological concept of groups and the different forms groups take.
2. Analyze the social processes that produce conformity in groups.
KEY TERMS (listed in text)
attribution error (131)
attribution theory (131)
bureaucracy (141)
groupthink (137)
ideal type (141)
instrumental needs (129)
secondary group (129)
social network (132)
total institution (140)
triad (128)
utilitarian organization (141)
KEY PEOPLE
Solomon Asch (135)
Georg Simmel (128)
LECTURE OUTLINE
I. Types of Groups
1. A group is a collection of individuals who interact with one another,
share goals and norms, and have a subjective awareness as “we.” Not all
gatheringslike social categories or audiencesare groups.
A. Dyads and Triads: Group Size Effects
1. Georg Simmel (18581918) is known as the discoverer of group size
B. Primary and Secondary Groups
1. Charles Horton Cooley (18641929) introduced the concepts of
primary and secondary groups.
2. The primary group is defined as a group consisting of intimate, face-
to-face interaction and relatively long-lasting relationships.
a. Primary groups serve expressive needs (also called socioemotional
needs).
intimate ties.
C. Reference Groups, to which a person may or may not belong, are those that
people use as a standard for evaluating their own values, attitudes, and
behaviors. They serve as generalized versions of role models.
self-evaluation and self-esteem.
D. Reference groups don’t have to be actual people. The media can serve as a
powerful reference group and influence how people perceive themselves.
Positive representations of one’s group can promote strong self-esteem,
whereas negative representations, including negative stereotyping, can lead
to diminished self-esteem. In-Groups, Out-Groups, and Attribution Error
1. W. I. Thomas (1931) notes that the “we”-ness of in-groups is
3. We perceive people in our in-group positively and those in out-groups
negatively.
a. Attribution theory research shows that individuals commonly
E. Social Networks are sets of links between individuals or between other social
units.
1. Networks based on race, class, gender, and occupations form with
particular readiness, especially job networks. Social networks tend
F. Social Networks as “Small Worlds”
1. The small world problem has shown that networks reach around the
world, making it effectively smaller for members of that network. A
II. Social Influence in Groups
1. The groups in which we participate exert tremendous influence on us.
Despite what social psychologist Philip Zimbardo calls the Not-Me
A. The Asch Conformity Experiment
1. Asch’s experiment showed that even clear objective facts couldn’t
group size effect.
B. The Milgram Obedience Studies
1. In Milgram’s first study, 65% of the volunteer subjects administered a
shock of what they believed to be lethal voltage to a confederate when
C. The Iraqi Prisoners at Abu Ghraib: Research Predicts Reality?
1. In the spring of 2004, it was revealed that U.S. soldiers, acting as military
police guards in Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, had engaged in severe torture,
D. Groupthink
1. According to I. L. Janis, groupthink is the tendency for group members to
reach a consensus opinion, even if that decision is downright stupid.
2. Janis investigated several ill-fated presidential decisions. All were
decisions made by a small group of expert advisors, and all were fiascoes.
E. Risky Shift (or polarization shift) is the tendency for groups to
weigh risk differently than individuals.
1. Most but not all group discussion leads to greater risk-taking.
III. Formal Organizations and Bureaucracies
1. A formal organization is a large secondary group, highly organized to
accomplish a complex task or tasks and to achieve goals in an efficient
manner. Organizations develop organizational cultures and routinized
A. Types of Organizations
1. Normative Organizations – People join voluntary organizations (service
and charitable organizations) to pursue goals that they consider personally
worthwhile.
2. Coercive Organizations – Coercive organizationswhat Erving Goffman
described as total institutionsare organizations cut off from the rest of
society.
a. Examples are prisons and psychiatric hospitals.
3. Utilitarian Organizations – These are large organizations, either for-
profit or nonprofit, that are joined by individuals for specific purposes,
such as monetary reward.
B. Bureaucracy
1. A bureaucracy is a type of formal organization characterized by an
authority hierarchy, a clear division of labor, explicit rules, and
f. efficiency.
C. Bureaucracy’s “Other Face”
1. Actual bureaucracies rarely conform to the ideal type because of informal
structuresocial interactions in bureaucratic settings that ignore, change,
D. Problems of Bureaucracies
1. Problems of bureaucracies include the already discussed risky
shift and groupthink.
2. Ritualism – This refers to a rigid adherence to rules as an end in itself,
regardless of whether the purpose for the rules is accomplished.
3. Alienation – This occurs when stresses on rules and procedures within
bureaucracies result in a decrease in the overall cohesion of the
and absenteeism.
E. The McDonaldization of Society
1. George Ritzer coined the term McDonaldization of society to refer
2. The four dimensions of McDonaldization are:
a. efficiency moving production in a streamlined path from start to finish,
3. McDonaldization brings many benefits, but also poses the danger of
dehumanization.
F. Diversity in Organizations
1. Since organizations tend to reflect patterns within the broader society, the
hierarchical structure of positions is marked by inequality in race, gender,
and class relations. Women and ethnic minorities often take on the same
IV. Functionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interaction: Theoretical
Perspectives
1. The functionalist perspective focuses on the positive functions of
LECTURE/DISCUSSION SUGGESTIONS
1. McDonaldization. Conduct a discussion with students about how education,
admission, and registration policies, and other aspects of your college or university
2. McDonaldization and globalization. Watch the film Inside McDonalds and then have
the class discuss the following issues: how mom and pop businesses have the
3. Bureaucracies and Groups. Invite a representative from your campus student
development or student services division to speak to the class about the support
services, student activities, and clubs available to students. Alternatively, refer to the
4. In-groups and Out-groups. Select an example of U.S. foreign policy involvement
with adversaries, preferably one that is currently featured in the news. Read selections
from presidential or state department statements justifying the involvement and
5. Social Influence. Show a depiction of the Milgram Obedience Studies, available in
most colleges’ social psychology collections, in class. Seeing the actual experiment
6. Groupthink. Present one of Janis’s examples of ill-fate presidential decisions
7. Diversity Training. Describe the diversity training promoted by your college or
university. Lead a discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of the plan, and
encourage students to think about how the training can be sabotaged or be made more
effective.
8. Preventing groupthink. Based on understandings of the social conditions that
contribute to the pattern of groupthink, have a class discussion about how the
9. Alienation in Education. After covering the basic tenets of alienation in the
STUDENT ACTIVITIES
1. Resistance. Have students identify something in society that is highly
2. Reference Groups. Assign students to select a reference group that is meaningful to
them and analyze the role of this reference group and how it affects their identity, self
discussion could also be conducted online.
3. Networks. Assign students to diagram their social networks, including those they
know on a personal basis and those to whom they are linked through organizational
4. Bureaucracy. Ask students to write a description of a bureaucracy they are
personally connected with, such as the college or a workplace. What features of the
5. Formal Organizations. Have students analyze a formal organization they are familiar
with. This could be a sorority or fraternity, a voluntary organization, a local
6. McDonaldization. Have students select a topic such as childcare, healthcare, or
human services programs such as shelters for the homeless. Next, they need to design
7. Race and Gender in Bureaucracies. Have students discuss the question, “Has
Racial and Gender Equality Been Achieved in Bureaucracies?” using Virtual
Explorations or the Student Companion website.
8. Cultural Diversity Project: Taking Roots on Your Campus. Invite several top
campus officials to a presentation and discussion led by your class (that include other
9. InGroups. Have students research the deaf community and its dynamics, then have
the class walk around one day acting as if they cannot hear, and watch the
10. Expressive Needs. Have students work in groups discussing how their family
satisfies their expressive needs. Have them discuss what the functions of a primary
group are and the outcomes of social changes on their lives.
11. Total Institutions. Form discussion groups in order to address how total institutions
12. Abu Ghraib. Read the original exposure of the torture of Iraqi prisoners in Abu
VIDEO SUGGESTIONS (Videos with a * next to them have corresponding activities
below.)
Insight Media (https://search.alexanderstreet.com/)
has a number of excellent videos and DVDs related to groups and organizations,
including, for example:
Group Influence (2001, 30 min.)
Dr. Irving Janis introduced the concept of groupthink by asking and then answering
these questions: How do groups really make decisions? What drives groups to agree
despite the better judgement of some, or even all, participants? Why do group decisions
sometimes result in monumental error? What are the signals to watch for?
Kid Nation (13 episodes, approx. 50 min. each)
This reality show gathered dozens of children and required them to create a functioning
Obedience: The Milgram Experiment (45 min.)
The video of Milgram’s classic experiment on obedience and conformity remains a
powerful tool for teaching students about the impact of social influence. Despite aging
visuals and audio, the experiments are still fascinating. Available in most college libraries.
Quiet Rage: The Stanford Prison Experiment (2004, 52 min.)
* We Live in Public (2010, 90 min.)
Film on Josh Harris. Harris, an Internet inventor, lost the fortune he made with Jupiter
VIDEO ACTIVITIES
After watching Groupthink (see above), write a short paper that relates a personal
experience in which the student either witnessed or experienced the group pressures at
work in groupthink and suggest ways to remedy such effects in a group decision-making
situation.
Watch the movie We Live in Public (see above). Address the following questions:
1. How does the movie reveal modern society?
INTERNET EXERCISES
1. Have students search the Internet for McDonaldization. They will encounter
several home pages, some produced for sociology classes and others with a
more activist bent. Some of the sites that seem the most interesting include
2. Visit the website for Robert Putnam’s book, Bowling Alone, at
3. Have students do a website search on closed mental asylums in the U.S. In their
4. Foster Milo offers a funny look at favorite and worst government websites. Go to
the link and look at the different government websites from around the world.
Note: Resources from these websites could be used for student research
papers, short written assignments, group projects, or online discussions.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Foucault, Michael. 1995. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. New
York: Vintage. This book looks at how society has created authority structures around
discipline. Foucault traced the birth of the prison as a social organization that is
increasingly creating control of individuals and behaviors.
Kelman, Herbert C. & V. Lee Hamilton. 1989. The May Lai Massacre: A Military Crime
of Obedience,” pp. 112 in Crimes of Obedience: Toward a Social Psychology of Authority
and Responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without
Organizations. New York: The Penguin Press. A revelatory examination of how the
wildfire-like spread of new forms of social interaction enabled by technology is changing
the way humans form groups and exist within them, with profound long-term economic
and social effects, for good and for ill.
WEBSITE SUGGESTIONS
In addition to the Internet Exercises, you might find the following websites useful as
resources for student research or as bases for discussions.