McDaniel & Gates – Marketing Research, 9th Edition Instructor’s Manual
C. Casuist–compares a current ethical dilemma with examples of similar ethical dilemmas and
see Exhibit 2.6 Unethical Practices in Marketing Research (p 38)
II. Research Supplier Ethics
A. Low-Ball Pricing–quoting an unrealistically low price to secure a firm’s business and then
using some means to substantially raise the price
B. Allowing Subjectivity into the Research–should avoid using biased samples, misusing
statistic, ignoring relevant data, and creating a research design with the goal of supporting a
predetermined objective
1. Advocacy studies–commissioned by companies or industries for public relations purposes or
C. Abusing Respondents
2. Predictive dialers–dial phone numbers ahead of available interviews
3. Selling of names and addresses of potential customers to firms seeking sales leads
D. Selling Unnecessary Research–dealing with a client who has little or no familiarity with
marketing research often has the opportunity to “trade the client up”
E. Violating Client Confidentiality–information about a client’s general business activities or
the results of a client’s project should not be disclosed to a third party
III. Black Box Branding
IV. Client Ethics
A. Requesting Bids When a Supplier Has Been Predetermined–to predetermine which
supplier will received a contract and yet ask for proposals from other suppliers to satisfy
B. Requesting Bids to Obtain Free Advice and Methodology–solicit detailed proposals,
including complete methodology and a sample questionnaire from a number of suppliers–
“picking the brains” of the suppliers, the client assembles a questionnaire and then contracts