2. Assume that Sally Smith, an interviewer, completed 50 questionnaires. Ten of the
questionnaires were validated by calling the respondents and asking them one opinion
question and two demographic questions over again. One respondent claimed that his age
category was 30-40, when the age category marked on the questionnaire was 20-30. On
another questionnaire, in response to the question, “What is the most important problem
facing our city government?” the interviewer had written, “The city council is too eager to
raise taxes.” When the interview was validated, the respondent said, “The city tax rate was
too high.” As a valuator would you assume that these were honest mistakes and accept the
entire lot of 50 interviews as valid? If not, what would you do?
The error on the first questionnaire may have been a judgment call on the part of the interviewer
or it may have simply been a missed stroke of the pencil or computer. The second mistake,
3. What is meant by the editing process? Should editors be allowed to fill in what they
think a respondent meant in open-ended questions if the information seems incomplete?
Why or why not?
4. Give an example of a skip pattern on a questionnaire. Why is it important to always
follow the skip patterns correctly?
1. Have you eaten at a fast food restaurant in the last two weeks? Yes No
5. It has been said that, to some degree, coding of open-ended questions is an art. Would
you agree or disagree? Why? Suppose that after coding a large number of questionnaires,
the researcher notices that many responses end up in the “Other” category, what might
this imply? What could be done to correct it?