2. If both parties—the buyer and the seller—choose to abide by the terms of a sales contract that does
not meet the requirements of the UCC even if they are not legally bound to do so, neither party can
later avoid the contract.
5. Whether a contract is for the sale of goods or the supplying of a service is determined by which
factor is predominate.
6. If the parties to a sales contract indicate that the price must be fixed by them or by a third person at
a later date, no binding contract arises if the price is not thus fixed. If the price can be computed
from the terms of the contract, the contract is valid.
Answers to Case Problems
(Page 186)
1. No. The court said there was no agreement that identification would occur at a particular time or in
a particular manner. Since there was no record of how much corn Sunbelt had on hand at the time
of the sale to Whitham there was no way to show there was sufficient corn to complete the contract.
In addition there was no mass of corn that could be identified in the contract. In re Sunbelt Grain
WKS, LLC, 427 B.R. 896 (Kan.)
(Or. Ct. App.)
4. Yes. Even though incidental services such as the training and consulting were included in the
contract it was for the sale of goods—the computer software. The court pointed out that without the
sale of the software, the services were unnecessary. Wachter Management Co. v. Dexter & Chaney,
Inc., 144 P3d 747 (Kan.)